User talk:Noah Sadhwani/sandbox

Overall, I really like your investigation on COVID-19’s influence on biotechnology industry. It's interesting to know that this industry was less affected by the pandemic. Especially, giving the data and some reasons behind, readers can understand what’s really happening. In the second paragraph, you mentioned about AI; but it would be better if you could corporate it into your biotechnology research by explaining how the technology impacted the industry. I also think you can expand more on the reasons how the index is dropping besides the lack of FDA approvals. While you are including the data, why don’t you insert the graph or any sort of data image to clearly demonstrate the trend? GinaGuan4 (talk) 20:33, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Nick Allen Review
What does the article (or section) do well? - You did a great job at giving the reader an unbias overall view of how the market has performed during the Covid-19. It read as a factual article with no author bias opinions.

What changes would you suggest overall? - I think your article could become stronger if you included some history on previous viruses and how they impacted biotechnology sector to see if companies or the industry got over valued and created a possible small bubble. What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? - The most important thing to do is to finish the overview of top performing and worst performing companies that you highlighted at the end of this article

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! - I like how you highlighted separate companies at the end I may highlight separate cities and how their real estate market has been specifically affected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick allen0 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Many positives in this draft, Noah--really nice job! A few minor grammar/usage things to clean up but overall the organization and presentation is solid. Would modify the section title "worst performing" to something else and also maybe add some discussion of how the industry responded to other things like H1N1, for example. Amyc29 (talk) 14:39, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Joe Reilly Review
Hey Noah, I actually did my peer review earlier but realized I never posted it to your talk page. Im very sorry about that. Your article seems pretty much finished and is fantastic, but I hope that my review is somewhat helpful.

What does the article (or section) do well? The overall structure of your article is easy to follow and the information you have included is very informative and easy to understand. What changes would you suggest overall? I noticed in your lead section that you are missing some punctuation at the end of sentences. What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Since my feedback is so late I really can’t find anything substantial that would improve your article besides the fact that I would be interested in a section about how covert operation from foreign intelligence agencies have an effect on both making a vaccine and how such operations might effect stock value. Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! I definitely aim to have my writing so clear and concise. Im amazed how numerous your sources are and how you were able to put together so much information and make it flow into a cohesive article. JReilly15 (talk) 19:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)