User talk:Noah emmanuel95

November 2013
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Roman Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 15:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Cordileone portrait
Take care, the picture is not yet incorporated! Try again. Super48paul (talk) 16:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Michael Olson.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Michael Olson.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from URL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Ordination of Bishops
Please refrain from changing the ordination of a bishop to consecration, unless it refers to a Catholic bishop prior to 1968 at the latest. The Second Vatican Council's document Christus Dominus (1965) refers to the "Order of Bishops". Prior to the council, bishops were for centuries not considered a separate order, but existed within the Order of Presbyters (priests). In 1968 the Pontificale Romanum was officially changed by Pope Paul VI and the Rite of Ordination of a Bishop was instituted. While there is a laying on of hands, chrismation of the head and consecration prayer in the rite there are also a laying on of hands and consecration prayers for deacons (but no chrismation) and presbyters (chrismation of the hands) and we rightly refer to them as ordinations. Wikipedia provides encyclopedic articles and they are to be accurate to the time period in which they correspond/describe. By putting in inaccurate, outdated, or terminology preferable to certain subgroups you are misleading people who use them as a reference. Farragutful (talk) 19:12, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

honorific prefix
Hi there. I see that you added "His Grace" before "The Most Reverend" to the article about John Roach (bishop). I'm not sure if this is a correct honorific prefix, because it creates a redlink, and the reference cite in the article doesn't support it. Could you please add a reference, and format your edit so it doesn't cause a redlink? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 06:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You are correct to be skeptical. The honorific "His Grace" in the Catholic Church is used by archbishops in the United Kingdom and Canada.  (It is probably used by other Commonwealth countries in the UK, but I am less familiar with the others.)  It is not used by archbishops in the United States, unless of course you are Archbishop Meyers in Newark who does use it. He is the only one, however.  Archbishops who are not Cardinals use the honorific "His Excellency" like other bishops.  Cardinals are referred to as "His Eminence", just as in other countries. Farragutful (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Please stop adding "His Grace" to prelates not from the UK or Canada. It is incorrect. Elizium23 (talk) 06:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Miguel de la Madrid, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 06:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bishop John Joseph Cassata.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Bishop John Joseph Cassata.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 11:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bishop John J. Cassata.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Bishop John J. Cassata.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 11:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC)