User talk:NobleJohn

May 2013
Hello, NobleJohn. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article John A. Noble (Artist), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. StarM 00:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright
Please be mindful of copyright, much of the text you used was lifted directly from here which is not permitted per WP:COPYRIGHT StarM 00:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your email
Hi! Please do not contact me off wiki to discuss. That's what talk pages are for and it's easiest to keep all conversations in one place so anyone can join in as needed. Here are the answers to your email - happy to answer any further questions.

''I wish to discuss further the deletion of my page about the artist John A. Noble. I believe the article to be impartial and cited all the material I used. The subject of the article is deceased and has been for thirty years. There is very little known about him except from the two sources I extensively cited in my article. Were there particular aspects that did not adhere to Wikipedia rules or were there issues with the article in its entirety? I understand not directly linking the website of the associated organization and will not do that in the future. But I am unsure about how to approach an article about a deceased person with very few available sources about him. I believe that the article simply stated facts about the subjects life and was careful not to be biased when I described him and to avoid direct use of passages from my sources. I would very much appreciate if you would clear up the specific issues and what you would recommend I do in order to make the article publishable.

''

The main issue is whether Mr. Noble is notable as it's defined by Wikipedia standards. They're a little different from typical notability guidelines, so the linked article is worth reading. If little is known about him, he may not meet our guidelines as we require substantive coverage in reliable sources that determine a subject's notability. If he's not independently notable, perhaps the Noble Maritime Collection article would benefit from information on him and why they deemed his collection important. Whichever route you take, please make note of our copyright guidlines which specifically cover how we can use third party text. It cannot be copied directly even if sourced. Happy to answer any more questions in more detail if you need. Thanks StarM 02:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 16:20, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:John A. Noble, c. 1950s.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:John A. Noble, c. 1950s.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback from 78.26
78.26  (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 15:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)