User talk:Noblecitizen

Reconsider...University of Limerick History Society
It is highly unfair that you have chosen to pick this article for deletion, since it is work in progress. To encourage the participation of sudents in socities it is necessary to create a full and accurate reference to each club and society. The page is not yet finished and awaits information on the Journal History Studies which is the only student-run academic journal in Ireland and one of the few in Europe. This is a serious and prominent achievement. You suggestion that the society has won no awards is inaccurate and you have displayed little patience in awaiting the completion of the article.

An entry on this fine site without completion is necessary for students to have an initial referral and for present Doctors and Professors who are former members of the Society.

The individuals listed are only the committee and not the full membership.

I have been instructed to request that you reconsider your suggestion and allow for the completion of this page. Thankyou for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noblecitizen (talk • contribs)


 * Hello, I have nominated the page for deletion on the grounds that I do not believe the club meets to the notability criteria to merit a page on Wikipedia. The award that you have entered in the article appears to be that it has won an award for being the best club in the University, which is not sufficient of its own accord unless there are other clubs in the university which are notable for wikipedia. Nominations are not made on the basis of whether the article is good or incomplete, but whether there is an assertion in the article as to why the subject is notable, which in this case it would appear not to be. Also, I do not believe that nominating an article for deletion amounts to a violation of WP:BITE as it is a comment on the worthiness of the subject, not the writing or contributing ability of yourself. A similar case occurred a few months ago at Articles for deletion/Adelaide University Engineering Society. If you would like to debate this, please put comments on the deletion page, rather than blanking it and asserting that the deletion is invalid and also removing the tag on the article. Regards, ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 03:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC).

File source problem with File:Me,roger,seamus,john&emma.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Me,roger,seamus,john&emma.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)