User talk:Nobleeagle/Archive12

Re:Punjab
It's a very nice idea indeed. Punjab articles tend to be worse than articles related to many other parts of India, especially Bengal, South India and Maharashtra (not sure about Pakistani Punjab :p). To be honest, I can't be actively involved in helping articles for awhile but when I have the time, I will spend it well. WP:WIF, which was linked on the Signpost has made me and probably others to realise that there is too many trivial disputes going on compared with Feature Articles being created. Nice initiative! I'll join but as I said won't do much at the moment. GizzaChat  &#169; 07:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, on another story I just found Australian rules football in India and Australian_rules_football_in_Pakistan (which has much more detail), lol! GizzaChat  &#169; 12:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Nobleeagle this is a good idea ....you should also rope in user Abulfazal ...a pakistani punjabi ,who will be a great help Cheers.Intothefire 11:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Re.
I am not questioning anyone's contributions or hard work. But their Attitude and misuse of Power. Can you honestly tell me Rama was right in banning me for the so called "insults", and without any warnings either? All my blocks were caused by me trying to debate with you guys. He simply tried to block me for as long as possible using misleading evidence.

And then we have Bakauprman, who makes extremely insulting remarks against our Prophet. What is even more disturbing, is the pattern of the half a dozen users who claim he did nothing wrong. If I had made such comments against Hinduism, I would have been permanently banned.

I know you and the others haven't thrown around hate speech, and I respect that. But Bakaman has obviously got something against Pakistanis and Islam. I don't see how anyone justify this.

As for the Punjab project, I would love to take part, that's if I don't get a lengthy ban for upsetting Bakaman by pointing out his insults towards our Prophet.

p.s Its spelt Muhammad Ali Jinnah -- Unre4L  ﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ  UT 14:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Sinhalese
Damn straight im sinhalese. do u really think i could be tamil!! zomg so unbelievable. Damareinu 08:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Your edit of Kargil war
Please take a look at the sources. All Sources for Indian casualties are Indian. No Pakistani source is allowed there. And for the Pakistani figure, all I am asking is for a Western Source, instead of an Indian. 4000 is a ridiculous number, and just an estimate by a pro Indian source (Hinduonnet.com). No Western source goes above 700 for Pakistani casualties, I can provide more source, but please revert this figure. -- Unre4L  ﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ  UT 12:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

thanks
Congrats to you as well, couldn't have happened without your contributions.--Thugchildz
 * Congratulations Nobleeagle. Hmm is that pic fair use? Can't have it in userspace. We've got more on the menu. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Nah the pic isn't fair use its free but since the trophy is it needed the tagging, anyways the baseball article just lost its FA and stuff so thinking of losing the star there may be questions for the cricket article, it only has about 2 refs, it need way more refs than that...going to raise the issue in the project too--Thugchildz

user page
Hi Nobleeagle. kozakku sensei wa baka ne XD um just that im new to these user pages, so just as a mess around i sort of plagiarised ur user page...just to let u know its very temporary thanks Damareinu 08:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Nobleeagle - the punjab portal .....any progress ? waiting for this .Intothefire 10:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Re. Pro-Indian source
Many people consider him a traitor, besides, why go against the official figures. I have seen estimates for Indian casualties going up in 10 000. Maybe it would be more appropriate to compare estimates instead of official figures with Pro Indian estimates? -- Unre4L  ﺍﹸﻧﺮﮮﺍﻝ  UT 11:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:Ancient Pakistan
The article had a lot of edit wars, so I protected it. But, I guess you already know Admin's always protect the wrong version :). Please resolve the dispute in the talk page of the article. Good luck. --Ragib 22:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

RfC on Indian Mathematics
I thought you might be interested (at your convenience). Talk:Indian_mathematics Feedback is requested for a problem on the Indian mathematics page. The issue is disagreement between two users on whether entire versions should be reverted or better citations pointed out and procured on demand. Freedom skies 11:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Punjab Portal
 * ) Good start !

Cheers ...should I suppose Nobleeagle is Nonleeagle Malhotra ! Intothefire 16:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Punjab-geo-stub
Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. In this particular case, Punjab geography stubs are already well covered by two stub types, one for Indian Punjab and one for Pakistani Punjab - PunjabPK-geo-stub and IndianPunjab-geo-stub - as you would have been told had you come to WP:WSS first. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  23:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Your Welcome
Thank you. It's good to learn that after a year and a half I'm still a newbie.:-) rudra 02:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. I come and go. rudra 02:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:Paki
the word Pak means pure.Paki is the racial slur invented by the British media around the 70s to insult Pakistani immigrants in Britain.--Nadirali نادرالی

Punjab on WP India
Hi Nobleeagle, I've added punjab=yes to the WP India template. All you have to do is to populate the following:


 * Image:Punjabmap.png
 * Category:WikiProject Punjab articles
 * Category:FA-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:GA-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:B-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:Start-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:Stub-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:Non-article Punjab pages
 * Category:Disambig-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:Category-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:Template-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:List-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:Image-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:Redirect-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:Portal-Class Punjab articles
 * Category:Unassessed Punjab articles
 * Category:Top-importance Punjab articles
 * Category:High-importance Punjab article
 * Category:Mid-importance Punjab articles
 * Category:Low-importance Punjab articles
 * Category:Unknown-importance Punjab articles

Regards, =Nichalp   «Talk»=  17:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

WP Punjab
I think it's ok if it overlaps. The same parameters can be added to the WP Pakistan template. By geography, WP Punjab is a child of Pakistan and India. There's no problem having a low rating for India and top rating for Punjab. Perfectly ok. See the example below.


 * Amritsar: WP India importance=high cities=yes punjab=yes punjab-importance=top
 * Lahore: WP Pakistan punjab=yes punjab-importance=top

Make sure that the category is a subset of India, Pakistan, and South Asia.

The same can be transcluded as given in the template Template:WikiProjectBanners used on Talk:Afghanistan

Regards, =Nichalp   «Talk»=  10:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello Nobleeagle! Thanks for creating WikiProject Punjab. I think its a good idea and look forwarding to contributing. Also, thanks for your support at arbcom. I really appreciate it. With regards, AnupamTalk 22:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. I recently told some Punjabi Pakistani users about the project in order to give representation to Pakistani Punjab. I recently noticed that there was no Selected Picture in Portal:Punjab. Perhaps we can include, Image:Horse&CattleShow.jpeg, a picture of Pakistan's National Horse and Cattle Show held in Lahore, Punjab. Looking forward to hearing from you soon. With regards, AnupamTalk 05:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology
Dear Nobleeagle, (Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology) I am surprise to see that you reverted my addition with your comments stating that “Text does not make sense and you consider my changes as POV in spite of providing internal like wikipedia site. Request you kindly allow others to enhance the contents of wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by John945 (talk • contribs) 07:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC).

Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology
Dear Nobleeagle, (Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology) I am surprise to see that you reverted my addition with your comments stating that “Text does not make sense and you consider my changes as POV in spite of providing internal like wikipedia site. Request you kindly allow others to enhance the contents of wikipedia. John Paul 07:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology
Dear Nobleeagle, (Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology), Thanks for kind reply, anyhow my changes didn’t mentioned that all religions of India are actively  represents Hindutva and India is country of religions and your sentence does not represent that. However I am not changing the meaning of Hindutva ideology but representing all Indian religions. Hope you will not revert my changes. John Paul 10:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Template:WP Pakistan‎
Please do not modify/edit Template:WP Pakistan‎ to add any child projects. Many major topics related to Pakistan have their own child WikiProjects. Use their banners instead. (e.g. WikiProject Punjab (Pakistab) etc.) Szhaider 15:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

lol
It could represent the egyptian prince, or the concept of Baka in Buddhism. Whatever you want it to be. Baka man  23:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology
Dear Nobleeagle, (Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology), It not correct to state only Dharmic religions in India are prominent and Native. It's OR and not accordance to wikipedia policy, I changed the statement twice to reach agreement but its seem to me you are not willing to comprise at all but still  request you to kindly change the statement to NOR. John Paul 13:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:Punjab
There seems to be only 3 users active in WP: Pakistan. Maybe they aren't comfortable in fragmenting the WP Pakistan into regional groups so soon. If the topic in question applies to current day India, then it becomes a subset of India WP. If applies to Pakistan, then add the WP Pakistan and WP Punjab templates.

I'm not sure about the pre=yes articles. What sort of articles would apply to current day Pakistan, but only to WP India articles before 1947, other than historical? =Nichalp  «Talk»=  17:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I still haven't got the basis of dispute. Szchaider may not own the template, but WP Pakistan may not want regional fragmentization in the form of a sub workgroup. From your talk, he has mention that he's ok with WP Pakistan and WP Punjab coexisting peacefully on a top of a page which has more meaning to Pakistan than India. I'm sure adding the WP India template to Gujranwala would be out of line for WP India. That's why I've asked you what sort of articles for WP India would require the pre tag. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  05:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Salim Nasir
Thanks for tagging Salim Nasir. I had realised these problems with the articles but I always forget the proper names of the tags :-) Szhaider 07:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology
Dear Nobleeagle, (Ref: Sub: Definition and etymology), I appreciate you understanding and professional approach. You impressed me, so let me retain your sentence as it’s and add new line for other religions of India. With Love John Paul 08:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

RfC re User:Dbachmann
I have opened an RfC related to IAT at []. Could you please add your views to that.Sbhushan 16:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Greetings
Happy Holi !!--Dwaipayan (talk)

Happy Holi
My best wishes to you. Happy Holi ! Freedom skies 07:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Best wishes from me too :) --RF 23:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * My greetings to you Nobleeagle. Hopefully a start of a peaceful period.... And perhaps the ascension of the first Punjabi FA bio? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Category
I saw that you removed the merge tag at the Hindutva article. (Talk:Hindutva) You could also be interested to vote here --RF 23:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There is another discussion at the AIT article which could interest you. --Rayfield 21:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

lol
I wasn't aware I was a Hindu hater. Baka man  08:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

IAT
It seemed fair. The theory was presented in a straightforward way, and then the objections were raised. I consider it POV pushing when the opposing editors do not let the theory be actually presented without putting in denials of it ever paragraph, In the Out of India article, to be perfectly frank with you, I do not think the presentation fair. In every individual section the theory is quickly presented, and then a thorough refutation is given. This is not giving them a chance.
 * To the extent I know anthropology, it is obvious that the out of india theory in any of its forms is a peculiar misreading of the evidence, and I think any chance to let the theory be expounded will appear so weak, that those who are not politically or intellectually involved will come to the same conclusion. I strongly dislike most fringe theories, even those that are clearly absurd pseudoscience-- both in science and in social science. In many cases I suspect the motives and the intelligence of those who support them. (this obviously does not mean that some of them may turn out to be correct after all) I am aware of my general bias, and try to counter it by sympathetic editing for all such theories. I thus frequently arouse the ire of those who think just as I do about the theory, but think it unworthy of what I consider to be a fair hearing. There are some subjects that I would like to edit where I do not edit at all because of this.
 * I also see the obvious connection between Hindu nationalism and the OIT/IAT. I have no love for nationalism in any form, and India is one of the places which serve as examples of why I think it destructive. I think it excusable perhaps in small minorities--i think it despicable as coming from a majority populations against their neighbors or fellow-citizens. In real life I fight against such positions as affect me, and consequently my co-ethnic associates think people like me to be traitors. In WP we am trying to write an objective work, and the way to do this is to give full presentations of what we most hate. I consider this in the tradition of scholarship, and particularly of my own profession as a librarian. I derive it philosophically from the tradition of John Stuart Mill, though I am one of the rather rare libertarians of the left -- the far left by US standards.
 * So in addition to agreeing with your anthropological views, I agree with what I take to be your political views on the matter.  I even understand how  in the heat of the struggle you may feel very differently about the propriety of supporting positions than encourage hatred.  But I think of editors as reporters, and we have the duty to report what people say and what they think. We have the duty to keep our own beliefs out of it. See WP:Writing for the enemy. That essay presents it as a strategy for better writing, and indeed it is. But it is also for me one of my most deeply-held principles.
 * I am not sure you expected such an elaborate defense, but I have honed this argument in many previous debates on many previous topics. I regret that this has placed us on opposite sides over the article, but you may also rely on me to support attempts to discourage the presentation of views that you support. DGG 10:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

"Aryans"
I would like to draw your attention to this edit of mine. I had welcomed your creation of out of India as a good faith attempt to separate the scholarship from the propaganda. But this is inconsistent with your opposition to explicitly treating the propaganda itself, elsewhere. Yes, "out of India" has been suggested in good faith. Mainstream consensus has rejected it. That's how it is, sorry if that doesn't suit your preference. The present "supporters" are a Greek Yoga teacher, personal friend of the main source of contempoary Hindutva pseudoscience, and the author of Saffron Swastika. So it is hard to claim that recent OIT supporters did propose their ideas in any way unrelated to contemporary nationalism (rememnber, bona fide "OIT" should be a detached topic of ancient history, not contemporary sentiment). What do you want? There can be no disputing that the topic is spammed by unscholarly mysticism. The blatant contraditions between the various "indigenous Aryans" scenarios makes this more than evident. If your intention is really to obscure the existence of such blatant propaganda stunts, it would seem that your approach had been dishonest from the beginning. I have gone out of my way to explicltly grant whatever tiny scholarly merit may be behind all this, but it's really not a lot. What is your preference? Keep it separate for whatever it is worth, or drown it in a discussion of all the undisputable mysticist nonsense going down in Indian nationalism? I must say I would be honestly disappointed in you if I had to find you are just here for glossing over the propaganda after all, just in a slighlty more subtle or intelligent way than the likes of WIN or Bakaman. dab (𒁳) 08:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

tamilcanadian.com
You are invited to comment at Talk:List of Hindu nationalist parties — coe l acan — 00:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)