User talk:Noblewikicause

Welcome!

 * }

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Subramanian Swamy appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.  The Mi ke •Wassup doc? 13:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Subramanian Swamy, you may be blocked from editing.  The Mi ke •Wassup doc? 17:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Sonia Gandhi
In answer to your question (which you put in the edit summary instead of the talk page) in Sonia Gandhi, Wikipedia is not an index of all the controversies a person has been linked with. The Wikipedia community treats its Biographies of Living persons very sensitively. There has been debate on whether the Controversies/Criticism section should be included explicitly or not. See WP:CSECTION for this. The general opinion is that the criticism should be integrated into the body of the article, rather than having a separate section. For examples of articles where the criticism has been integrated, see Yeddyurappa and Jawaharlal Nehru, which are two articles where I have integrated the criticism into the article. Hope this answers your questions. Contact me on User talk:MikeLynch if you need to contact me. Have a good day.  The Mi ke •Leave me a message! 07:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The discussion on whether the contraversies should be integrated with body or in a seperate section is a different debate. As far as this particular edit is concerned, New york times advertisement has been one of the biggest contraversies after bofors and foreign birth. And talking about presentation, my personal opinion would be to have a seperate section as its more readable, presentable and structured. However if wiki guidelines follow the concept of having it with body, will be more than willing to confirm to the standards.
 * OK. Please start a discussion on the talk page of the article, so that other editors can put in their thoughts.  The Mi ke •Leave me a message! 14:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)