User talk:Nobody of Consequence/Archives/2008/August

Image:HLM`.png
Hi, I noticed you put a db tag on this image, I was wondering, are you sure it's copyvio? It looks based off User:Vardion's maps. Who is the 'Elspeth Monro' troll? Sorry for the dumb questions. +Hexagon1 (t) 02:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, cheers for the info, I support the deletion. What a strange vandal.. +Hexagon1 (t) 02:48, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO
According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (Madman Muntz) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Copyvio images
Hello, thank you for your report about the copyvio war images, and sorry you got the impression administrators weren't paying attention. I've made a report on commons (at commons:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems), and I expect they'll soon take action there. Please just give me a note if you see such activities resumed here on en-wiki, and perhaps add a note directly over at that commons report if it's there. Thank you for you vigilance, good job. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Kiev Night View
No, it is actually non-free, because it has to be usable for any purpose. Not being able to use it in print publications is a commercial use restriction, and is not allowed on Wikipedia. ViperSnake151 23:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The print restriction is not necessarily a commercial restriction. There are online commercial entities who could use this image as it clearly states it can only NOT be used in printed mediums. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 04:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * No, Free content must be usable for any purpose, anywhere. Per the definition, "Copies may be sold, swapped or given away for free, as part of a larger work, a collection, or independently. There must be no limit on the amount of information that can be copied. There must also not be any limit on who can copy the information or on where the information can be copied." (emphasis mine)
 * This means it's non-free. ViperSnake151 14:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Seconded - that is not a free license. &mdash; Mike.lifeguard &#124; @en.wb 14:55, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Madman Muntz
Hi NoC,

Just wanted to drop by and say how much I enjoyed Madman Muntz. What a wonderful article! I love "retro" articles like this, and it's great seeing them on Wikipedia. Thanks so much for your hard work on this article. :) Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester  05:25, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review
I have posted a question at Deletion review which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle (talk) 13:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Madman Muntz page
Thank you for your help in keeping this page trivia free. It seems to be the hardest lesson for new contributors to learn. Keep setting the example.Wikiuser100 (talk) 23:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Undid the undo about Carroll: this is a trivial and incidental reference that adds nothing to the Muntz article and is not about him at all; if it belongs anywhere in Wikipedia it belongs in a Carroll article. It is enough that Carroll is cited in a Muntz article at all, for what he is relevant: having copy-catted Muntz's ads, not appeared in a Disney movie parlaying his subsequent fame.  That is Carroll bio stuff.  Thank you.Wikiuser100 (talk) 09:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

re: Deerfield High School (Illinois)
Hello NoC!

I was wondering if I could get an explanation as to why those years of graduation you deleted got deleted? To the best of ny knowledge, it is SOP to include such information. LonelyBeacon (talk) 02:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Richter Studios page
I just updated some references. Good article. How can I help to keep it alive! Rs daveman (talk) 19:28, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Palin and Alaska Wolves
The article you cited says there's a loophole in the ban for Alaska. If that's the case it's not violating the ban. Other than that it looks good to me GatorOne (talk) 02:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)