User talk:Noegendyr

A tag has been placed on Mikkel Fogh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Finngall  talk  21:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Lorth) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Finngall  talk  21:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I've found no references for this so-called "Lorth phenomenon". While my search engine skills are not infallible, this indicates that either it is either complete bollocks, or that it is simply not notable enough to merit an article.  -- Finngall   talk  21:55, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * And furthermore, if there is no such thing as the "Lorth phenomenon" then contributors to it cannot be notable.--Anthony.bradbury 22:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)