User talk:Nofil Jawed

March 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Biman Bangladesh Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 23:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pakistan International Airlines, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 23:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Be careful editing if you have a connection to a subject
Hello, Nofil Jawed. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pakistan International Airlines, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Shaheen Air. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 01:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * And maybe you should also read WP:CIVIL regarding your edit summary in this edit.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 01:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Finally, forums are not reliable sources per WP:SPS .--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 01:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Stop using forums as sources . They are not considered reliable.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 02:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Nofil Jawed. Thank you.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 03:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Your recent editing history at Shaheen Air shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 03:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Warning for adding irrelevant information and sometimes Wrong Information too
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Pakistan_International_Airlines. Abdulrafey97 (talk) 09:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Hi there Nofel Jawed! You have been editing on various Aviation related pages recently. Giving information on Wikipedia is a good as Wikipedia is made for this but adding irrelevant info isn't required. Previously you've been given warning from other bots on Wikipedia and now again you're given warning for adding irrelevant and sometimes wrong info on aviation related pages especially at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_International_Airlines 's fleet section. I hope you understand this and the rules and regulations of editing in Wikipedia. As said earlier, no need add IRRELEVANT information even if your father works in the airline. Many of your editing were false editing.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Abdulrafey97 (talk) 09:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. MilborneOne (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Shaheen Air
Please explain why edits that:
 * fixed bad spelling
 * fixed bad grammar
 * removed unsourced speculation about the future in accordance with WP:CRYSTAL
 * removed advertising in accordance with Wikipedia Policy
 * removed background colours from a table in accordance with Wikipedia Policy
 * added a better-quality image
 * added better Wikilinks

are bad edits that must be undone. Respond here, I will be keeping watch on your Talk page. YSSYguy (talk) 19:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Please respond; why do you continually undo proper changes? What makes you think that bad spelling and bad grammar "looks better"? YSSYguy (talk) 22:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * You are blocked from editing all Wikipedia pages with the exception of this one. Not responding is but another indication that your only intention is to push your preferred version of articles and to war.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 21:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Block notice
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for continuing to edit war. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. MilborneOne (talk) 18:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Unblock Request

 * You were blocked for warring.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 12:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC).

Block Request
Hello Nofil Jawed. Regarding the full protection of the article, I think you should take a look at MilborneOne(talk · contribs)'s disruptive behaviour across it, along with the one at Shaheen Air (where the user is well over WP:3RR even after having been warned of this.) He continuously tries to start an editing war. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nofil Jawed (talk • contribs) 00:05, 27 April 2016‎ (UTC)


 * Are you sure you're referring to the right editor? has not been involved in editing the content of Shaheen Air, although they have protected the article at least twice to stop edit wars. —C.Fred (talk) 01:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

YSSYguy was also involed.


 * Frankly, you should only be worrying about your own conduct. Admins can take care of any other editors who might need sanctions. —C.Fred (talk) 00:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * This shows that Nofil Jawed's only intention is to continue warring.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 10:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)