User talk:Nogoodrobbinmaggymae

The Right Honourable and The Honourable
Please familiarise yourself with the The Right Honourable and The Honourable articles. Thanks Alex (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Oh very helpful, thank you Alex. And sorry just to dive in. I appreciate you being gentle with me.

Evidently, I got it wrong changing Ian Austin and John Woodcock to ‘the Honourable’ but having read the ‘Right Honourable’ article I still think it’s a mistake to list them as Right Honourables? I note the part of the article that says that the COLLECTIVE body of Lords Temporal and spiritual are the right honourable but I don’t think this is conferred on individual members of the House of Lords? So it would remain that these two would only be the right honourable if they were privy counsellors, and they are not.

I hope that makes sense and is not too pernickety! I will go ahead and change back Woodcock’s website as that bit is definitely out of date, according to the latest info on the parliament.uk site.

Thanks again for taking the time to engage with me, I appreciate it. Nogoodrobbinmaggymae (talk) 08:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The post nominals PC are used to differentiate peers who are also privy councillors from other peers, as covered in the Rights and privileges of members section of the Privy Council's article. Alex (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)