User talk:Nohaata

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hatsa Vii (February 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pythoncoder were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hatsa Vii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hatsa Vii, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hatsa_Vii Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pythoncoder&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hatsa_Vii reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—  python coder    (talk &#124; contribs) 13:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hatsa Vii (February 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hatsa Vii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hatsa Vii, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hatsa_Vii Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hatsa_Vii reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Hatsa Vii concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hatsa Vii, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mikozi Network


A tag has been placed on Mikozi Network, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hatsa Vii


A tag has been placed on Hatsa Vii, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hatsa Vii for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hatsa Vii is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hatsa Vii until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Nohaata. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Unblock
Thank you for fast reply like i said i hired someone write articles for why should i i open another account if i already had one amd if possible van you please show me the other account your mentioning i have been on Wikipedia for 2 years now ghis was my first time i trusted someone with my account. Nohaata (talk) 23:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

And its oky we can deleted this one so how can i get back on Wikipedia do i have to create another account? Or is there any way i need to follow? Nohaata (talk) 23:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for fast reply like i said i hired someone write articles for why should i i open another account if i already had one amd if possible van you please show me the other account your mentioning i have been on Wikipedia for 2 years now ghis was my first time i trusted someone with my account. Nohaata

And its oky we can deleted this one so how can i get back on Wikipedia do i have to create another account? Or is there any way i need to follow?

If you hired someone to edit
then that's still a form of sock puppetry. It is also not going to endear you to anyone here. You don't get back on Wikipedia unless you address the reasons for your block. You do not create another account. That is block evasion and still sock puppetry.--  Deep fried  okra    00:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello i understand can you help me and show me steps on how i can fix this please? Nohaata (talk) 22:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello i understand can you help me and show me steps on how i can fix this please?

unblock
{unblock|Dear admin's am hereby apologizing and admitting my mistake I was been blocked for creating multiple accounts which I didn't know it will affect me like this now the problem is becoming big even to my workmate at my office and other people around me every time someone uses our office wi-fi to edit Wikipedia they get blocked and put the blame on me which I understand and I have been getting calls and emails from other people because of the same problem I would like to apologize and forget and if there any way I can do to get out of this please tell looking forward for your help thank you Nohaata (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2020 (UTC)}