User talk:Noherzl

Regarding your edits of Mario Monti and Lucas Papademos
I think it would be beneficial if you read these: Neutral point of view, Verifiability and No original research. Basically, don't make wild claims without providing a reliable source. Thanks, «dæɑðe jekwæɑld» (talk) 23:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

You can not provide other sources than expertise in occurrences where other reliable sources does not exist. That is Wikipedia's tragedy. From the expertise (with an impressive amount of sources in it) it is possible to know and foresee these things. This phenomenon is known as Kassandra paradox. Thanks.

Warning
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Everyking (talk) 16:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Everyking is a tyrant.

Regarding your edits of Mario Monti
It is clear that you feel strongly about this person, which is fine. However, rather than adding paragraphs denouncing him, without citation (so it basically becomes your word against the other editor's words, which is a zero-sum game), maybe first opening a discussion on the "Talk" page about the issue would be more productive? If you can present your argument clearly on the discussion page, and convince the other editors of your claims, some kind of compromise can certainly be reached. However, simply re-editing the page every time someone removes it won't work in the long run, and the page will be locked, or you might be banned. Trainik (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)