User talk:Nohomers48/Archive 2010/11

Military operators of aircraft
Re you edits to various aircraft articles, I noticed your recent edit summary and threat to edit war in that summary. Please acquaint yourself with WP:3RR. The military operators section of various aircraft articles is to list all military forces that have operated that particular aircraft, whether or not that type is still in service with that country's military forces. For example, see the Supermarine Spitfire article. Currently, the only military still using the Spitfire is the Royal Air Force (Battle of Britain Memorial Flight). I'm sure you'd agree that the list of operators shouldn't be reduced to just the RAF! Mjroots (talk) 07:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see the talk page of the An-12 article where I've raised the issue of Mongolia operating the aircraft. Mjroots (talk) 07:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Your edit summary of They do not operate them, offer a reference stating the contrary and I will stop reverting your edit here is what i interpreted as a threat to edit war. As I said on the An-12 talk page, if consensus is reached to remove the entry I'm happy with that. What I'd like to see is discussion instead of constant reversion and counter-reversion. Mjroots (talk) 08:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

World in Conflict edits
Sawyer and Wilkins both command battalion-sized task force elements, evident by other characters in command of companies (Webb, Alpha; Bannon, Charlie; Parker, unknown). Such a command falls under the authority of a Lieutenant Colonel, who his referred to in conversation simply as colonel. The edits were made to reflect this, not pointless vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.229.248 (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

AK-101, Steyr AUG
Your edits at AK-101 and Steyr AUG have been reverted because Absolute Astronomy says the source of its articles is Wikipedia. Wikipedia cannot use itself as a source. ROG5728 (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Images
Hi, File:AKMS.png and File:Bad Company HK-416.png are nominated for deletion as copyright violations. Regards Hekerui (talk) 13:48, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Ground Attack and FW-190
Dear Nohomers48, Didn't revert it or anything, but if someone said the RAF was using cluster bombs in 1918 or the Russians had them when Germany invaded, it is true. The RAF had hand-grenades with the spoons held in place by wooden rings that broke when they impacted the ground with about a hundred packed in a crate under wing and the Russians had a anti-armor weapon dropped by the IL-2 that was a cluster weapon. It is where the German's got the idea. Also, a Russian incendiary weapon is considered the first real cluster bomb used in huge numbers. It was first used in the Finnish-Russian War of 1939-40. Jack 04:14, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Project 1166
Where you found information about operational frigate Dagestan? I found only info about his propably completation in 2011. Pls refer it today or tommorow I change it to "under construction" status —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hornet24 (talk • contribs) 08:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry - i change it little quicker - in page of builder that ships is info about second ship of class completation works--Hornet24 (talk) 08:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

ADF
I have found the wesbite where I got my information from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/young-aussies-heeding-armys-call/story-e6frgd26-1225857638151 STOP CHANGING IT OK? There is the link, go look at it, and stop making false claims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceskazbrojovka (talk • contribs) 10:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Brisbane meetup invitation
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a barbeque and meetup at Southbank this Sunday (26 June). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Brisbane. Hope to see you there! Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:00, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Putting the source
I am afriad that I might shatter the template if I put in the source. Can you do it or help me on it? FRYugoslavHero (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using AutoWikiBrowser to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Brisbane)

MfD nomination of Template:User DNFWP
Template:User DNFWP, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User DNFWP and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Template:User DNFWP during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dynamic&#124;cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 23:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)