User talk:Noir20754

Classic style
Are you Mark Turner or Francis-Noël Thomas? The only purpose of the classic style article seemed to be to advertise your book. Although your second submission was quite different, ust as with the first, it made absolutely no attempt to establish the notability of the concept. If you really think an article can be justified, raise the matter at deletion review. -- RHaworth 17:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Overdose (program)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Overdose (program), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: :. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Overdose (program)


The article Overdose (program) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No sign of notability, or even a URL to back up the continued existence of this program.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 12:06, 25 December 2013 (UTC)