User talk:Nolan135

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Nolan135, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  He  iro 05:33, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

The Culture of Critique series
Per this, User:Dougweller an admin is a good one to ask if edit warring or other shenanigans persist. You should probably start a discussion at the article talk page Talk:The Culture of Critique series first and seek to discuss it with the other editors. It might be a good idea to go ahead and cite the claim in the lede, good ones that pass WP:RELIABLE, and if they argue against that take it to Doug. It's Mardi Gras season here and I am about to be busy for the next 4 to 5 days, lol. Cheers,  He  iro 22:30, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Hate groups
Not even the Nazi Party is described as a hate group in its opening paragraph. It's described as a political party. I think you will need to put a proposal on the article talk page and get consensus first. StAnselm (talk) 20:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed, the designation has already been discussed on the talk page after a flurry of editing last July. StAnselm (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Serbian Radical Party
I would appreciate if you stated your designation and formal knowledge on Serbian Political Parties. Do you have your Phd in Serbian Politics? The Radical party is a populist party; that does not have to mean it is "far-right". Their inclusion and support of the Roma population in Serbia means they are not far-right for they lack the xenophobia necessary to be considered likewise. Also, they had Marija Serifovic support them; who is of mixed ethnic background, including Turkish, Croatian, Bosniak. They are Radical in the sense of they are against the current status-quo, left-right economically they are indeed left wing. Nationalism does not need to be a right-wing phenomenon. The fact that they want restitution for the Krajina Serbs who were ethnically cleansed out of Croatia, and advocate an aggressive campaign with regards to Kosovo is not right-wing nationalism. Claiming so is the equivalent to me calling you a violent and ill-mannered individual for fighting back against a thief who attempts to steal your wallet.

If you do not have a formal understanding of Serbian politics, I highly suggest you do not intend on preaching about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1389records (talk • contribs) 16:58, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Authoritarian types of rule template
Hi, Nolan, you should avoid filling such templates (which are meant to depict only general and essential types) with pointless, random and whimsical enumerations, which will only generate dispute and conflict. Thank you. 190.48.127.37 (talk) 17:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Russia Today
There is an ongoing discussion on the talk page as to whether or not Russia Today should be included in the Propaganda Organizations category. Please discuss your opinions there as opposed to simply reverting it.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 23:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC))

E-mail
Hello. Could you possibly send an e-mail to me at wssaturn@gmail.com or enable the wikipedia e-mail function. I would like to ask some questions about the "white supremacist" label currently being used on the A3P page. Thank you.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:18, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)