User talk:Nolanus

Rock, paper, scissors
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --McGeddon (talk) 10:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, but I hope, that you will send this message to Mercy too. I dont understand why you didnt. --Nolanus (talk) 15:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Category:Hector Berlioz
Category:Hector Berlioz, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC) Thanks for information. --Nolanus (talk) 16:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Please insert your comments after those of others -- just like I've done here -- and not within their signed statements. We are not permitted to modify the statements of others at CfD and doing so in the way you've done is confusing. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:54, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

OK, but it was clear that the modification was mine. --Nolanus (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Île aux Vaches (disambiguation)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Île aux Vaches (disambiguation), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kumioko (talk) 22:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Cochin (1504), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conspiracy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Novial
Category:Novial, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Vaccine hesitancy, did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. While I maintain your hatred for anti-vaccination activists who use falsehoods and disinformation to propagate their message (which have caused untold numbers of deaths around the world), putting these pages in Category:Murders and the like is disruptive editing. Bangalamania (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Krim
Hi! Please see MOS:DABSHORT: when writing the description of entries on disambiguation pages, one of the main rules of thumb is to [k]eep the description associated with a link to a minimum, just sufficient to allow the reader to find the correct link. Besides being brief, these descriptions should also be neutral, much like the rest of the encyclopedia, they're not a platform for expressing opinions, no matter how valid they may be (see WP:NPOV). – Uanfala (talk) 12:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You are argument is absolute nonsense and your link off topic. And the sentence is no opinion, it is a simple fact. --Nolanus (talk) 23:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Uanfala (talk) 10:59, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Please, stop embarassing yourself and stop pretending, that your are somebody important here... Your are absolutely not and everybody who has seen your user page and talk page can see it, everybody is mocking you. In fact, i am the only person here who takes you a little serious... :) --Nolanus (talk) 17:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC)--Nolanus (talk) 17:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
 * BTW, I was the one who had tried to a little compromise but refused it without discussion. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Krim&diff=prev&oldid=1130331867 --Nolanus (talk) 17:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)--Nolanus (talk) 17:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)