User talk:Nolian

June 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race (season 5), is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Rummskartoffel 17:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm Novem Linguae. I noticed that you recently removed content from Template:DragRaceProgressTable/doc without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Novem Linguae (talk) 03:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you recently removed content from Drag Race Holland (season 2) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 10:42, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 4). ''Enough is enough. You have been reported and will most likely be blocked for your persistent removal of content.'' Daundelin  ❁  12:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for persistently removing content of articles without explanation. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Qeustion Comment
So what part of the warnings you received, and your block, was unclear? Daundelin ❁  14:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Daundelin ❁  03:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Enough is enough. Daundelin  ❁  16:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Stop ignoring the messages you have been receiving
I have put in for you to be blocked again, because you are ignoring all warnings and you have refused for over two months to actually engage in a discussion. Enough is enough. Daundelin ❁  19:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)