User talk:NomadAnalyst

Welcome!
  Hello, NomadAnalyst!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Grayfell (talk) 04:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hello. Regarding your edit to Tokenomics, please note that neither Coindesk nor Decrypt are considered reliable sources. Coindesk in particular has been discussed, and rejected, many times on Wikipedia, per WP:COINDESK.

Please also review WP:OR. Instead of adding information you personally know to be true and then looking for sources which support that, start with reliable sources and work backwards. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 07:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello again. Generally, when you are reverted, especially more than once, the next step is to discuss your proposed changes on the article's talk page.
 * In this case, it would be helpful if you could address my concerns about original research. If you are keeping the exact same wording and just cycling through sources to find ones which are reliable, this shows that you did not start with sources, instead you started with your own ideas then looked for sources which already supported those own ideas. As I said, this isn't the best approach, since Wikipedia doesn't publish original research.
 * It would also be helpful if you could respond so that I and others know you are aware of your talk page.
 * Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 20:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)