User talk:Nomadic1

stubs
Please use {roman-stub} for your articles. --MarSch 1 July 2005 16:26 (UTC)


 * I found quite a few articles that were unstubbed. I have no preference to what stub you should use, I only care that you use one. Isn't ancient rome and the holy roman empire kind of the same thing? --MarSch 2 July 2005 11:13 (UTC)


 * For creating new stubs go to WP:WSS. --MarSch 3 July 2005 11:22 (UTC)

Fürstenberg
I wonder if you would take a look at the Furstenberg disambiguation page I've created? I'm relying on a rather outdated 1911 Brittanica entry for most of my information. Are there still the two houses, Donaueschingen and Konigshof, or has one or the other become extinct? It seems there were several branches that arose only to have a scion die with out issue, its titles to devolve upon another branch. It gets very confusing, and I don't have access to good sources.

I noticed that you had done work on several of the Fürstenberg principalities and counties, and I thought we should coordinate our efforts. There need to be biographies created on the more illustrious members of the family (the marshalls and diplomats and cardinals, not just the fashion designer!) and the details of how they all relate to each other worked out. When I have a chance, I will be contacting this gentleman, my old professor,, to see how, if at all, he fits into the picture. --Jpbrenna 7 July 2005 07:31 (UTC)

hre and german history stub === ==

I wasn't trying to be facetious in the least about the problems concerning the not-quite consensus in en-wiki; there have been proposals ranging from 800 to 1990 to be seen as the start of 'german' history Lectonar 7 July 2005 10:06 (UTC)

Fürstenberg (again)
There are a couple of concentration camp articles linking to the Fürstenberg page. They seem to be describing a place 90 km north of Berlin that was connected to the Ravensbruck camp. That's why in my original Fürstenberg disambiguation, I put "several" places because I thought there must be at least two places by that name in Germany. I wonder if this other Fürstenberg got its name from the Hohenzollerns or some other family having a residence there? The other possibility is that the person who made the concentration camp article made a mistake. I don't speak German so my ability to research this matter is limited. If you find any information, please let me know. Thanks! --Jpbrenna 03:44, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I I found the German page, Fürstenberg which explains everything. I will try to import it piece by piece to the English Wikipedia and have you look at it when I'm done, so that it doesn't get botched too badly ;)
 * Ok, check it out: Fürstenberg. I wonder, should we merge the Fürstenberg (state) page there as well? --Jpbrenna 16:14, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It sounds like a good idea to me. --Jpbrenna 07:20, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Can you back check me
re: this edit

I was tracking down a link reference to 'Count of Stolberg', and inferred boldly, that the given edit was a better 'cold discription' of the inheritance record in this case&mdash;in the changes, I'm obviously attempting to make plain the title migration and get in the terms I know in use here in wikipedia.

Since you founded the original, figured you were more qualified than I to shoot holes in my revision (interpretation or discription)! (I find myself working on cross links and such, rationalizing articles into better mutual agreement and so forth fairly often crossing the many historical and places references in 1632 series which is focused fully in the 17th century mess that evolved into todays Germay.

Also, if you read or speak German, this article is in critical need of attention, despite my best cleanup try last evening&mdash;which I have reason to doubt and I can't cross check meanings with the de:wikipedia.) [I've asked someone who can to do that check, as well, but he's been contributing less frequently lately, so the more the merrier!]

Anyway, this (and that start of a) description seems most likely to me, and that's my story and I'm sticking to it! 

Is there an online (English) reference that can be accessed for this geological-geopolitical messiness in the Germanies? T'would be really handy. Thanks, and nice-to-meetchya! // Fra nkB 16:28, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Stolberg-Wernigerode
''Looks good. I would personally start with the description of Stolberg-Wernigerode, and then add the information about Stolberg and Wernigerode afterwards. You also don't need to so much give a description of partitioning, otherwise nearly every article in Wikipedia about a German state will end up with one. I'm not active at Wikipedia anymore and I don't even fix errors that I see. - Nomadic1 21:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)''


 * Thanks, that's a comfort. I've been very unactive myself. Wikipedia DOESN'T pay any bills! I'm trying to find a good balance on these geneological nightmares too. Not sure who put the partitions stuff in there, but at least with such, it makes it plain to the uninitiated (My 'education' has been at a high time cost! ... so I've a sense of how to fix things up so they read clear to a lay person.) at least how some of the terms developed. Thanks again! // Fra nkB 21:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Imperial Village
Hey I see you edit a lot of the list of hre states, I wanted to ask, have you found any source talking about Imperial villages? I see it around a lot but cannot find any good source to write an article on it. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  02:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Pappenheim-Alesheim
Please add a lead, one phrase. Please quote reliable sources.Xx236 (talk) 07:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Pappenheim-Treuchtlingen
We link Wikipedia pages by Interwiki. I have copied your link. However - what is the subject of your pages - the statelets or the family?Xx236 (talk) 08:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Pappenheim-Gräfenthal
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Nomadic1, thanks for creating Pappenheim-Gräfenthal!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add clear sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 07:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Isenburg-Kempenich for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isenburg-Kempenich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Isenburg-Kempenich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 18:17, 14 July 2019 (UTC)