User talk:Nome3000

Kony 2012 is not notable for inclusion on Wikipedia yet. Just because it has 2 million views on YouTube and 1 million friends on Facebook does not yet mean it is notable. Wikipedia is not a social network and it is not the place to promote your message, no matter how altruistic that message may be.— Ryulong ( 竜龙 ) 05:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm not trying to 'promote a message' in anyway through this wiki, I'm editing a section of this page so that it is more factual. If you look at my edits they have had very little to do with the wording of that section and much more to do with giving it the proper referencing that it needed. In failure or success of Kony 2012 it is still to be considered notable to a wiki page about him. I'd say that the vast amount of views of the video highlight its notability although, as my editing suggests, this was not the only source that gives it notability. I think it qualifies under the terms of notability (if this is not so please say).Nome3000 (talk) 05:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The place to discuss keeping this article is at Articles for deletion/Kony 2012.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

He deleted it because you won the argument. But, yeah, stick to the AfD. Though, at this point, I don't think you need to do much with the AfD. I would say just focus on improving the article proper. Silver seren C 07:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * This source should be useful as a general overview of the criticisms. Though I think other parts of the article needs to be expanded as well, since the criticism section is taking up half the article right now, which is a bit too much weight. Silver  seren C 17:42, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Kony 2012
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)