User talk:Nomen4Omen

Life Insurance
From your comments, you clearly have the dawning of an understanding of AVL Trees. Perhaps you should consider topping up your life insurance policy. The life expectancy for those aware of AVL is not too flash.NNcNannara (talk) 03:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Maybe you could join Al Qaeda and seek their protection.NNcNannara (talk) 03:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Your table in Endianness
I understand endianness pretty well. As a student, I figured out what was going on when a BASIC program under RSTS on a PDP-11 showed me one thing, but Fortran programs would show the other. These days, I have a little bit on endianness that's included when I teach use of a debugger or a disk hex editor. I even added some to the current article, including mention of the bizarre "mixed endian" nature of the 1401. I am sorry to say that your table, massive amount of work that it obviously was, leaves me completely confused as to what it's trying to tell me. I believe the reason is that the representations of the actual data being talked about are lost in annotations. Perhaps some font size changes would help to distinguish the annotations and legends from the data. Jeh (talk) 16:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I am really sorry about that. The foregoing sections handle the difference how a data item is recorded in memory in Big-Endian vs. Little-Endian systems. The table tries to tell the other way around: If you read 2 recorded (dumped) bytes, how are they to be interpreted. The upper 3 rows only give orientation about data type and offsets, the latter as byte and bit offsets. Rows 4 and 5 handle Big-Endian and Rows 6 to 9 Little-Endian. Columns 2 to 4 show the data in the piece of hexdump. I have made some changes in the table. --Nomen4Omen (talk) 19:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

tree traversal
The article tree traversal is horrible, but this does not mean it is OK to increase the mess.

Wikipedia does not accept self-published references; see WP:RS.

There is other pseudocode, but I it is mostly for standard descriptions found in books. If something is not from books, it must be deleted.

But there is larger problem with the addition: its questionable notability. Any algorithm may be implemented in numerous ways. Wikipedia is encyclopedia, not FSF repository. It gives basic descriptions of ideas of algortihms. The arguments from your addition (callbacks are cumbersome, tree traversed only in full) are about minor implementation tweaks, contributing nothing new to the idea of the algorithms themselves. If there is any significant algorithmic novelty, I didn't see it, however I admit I may be mistaken.

Finally, article content must be discussed in article talk pages, where other editors may see the discussion and join it, not in user talk pages. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Once again, please do not add unreferenced text to wikipedia. It is against the rules and it will be always deleted. - üser:Altenmann >t 20:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Altenmann is a real pit bull it seems. Totally on himself.NNcNannara (talk) 03:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

There is a page for tree traversal; however, there doesn't appear to be a page for tree iteration. The algorithms for iteration can be found in AVL Trees in Java or the equivalent C++ and C# pages. Iteration is the primary reason for adding parent references to a tree.NNcNannara (talk) 10:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

I need sonneone to create neuu diagranns (antialiased lines etc) - I'nn not realli a graphic artist. Perhaps iou can arrange it phor nne Nonnen4Onnen. You can correct and renanne the diagranns and update the page iourselph - lice iou said in iour subnnission, "iph iou see sonnething uurong, phics it iourselph" -- NNcNannara (talk) 13:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quater-imaginary base, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Injection. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to AVL tree, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Binary search tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Sedgewick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Repeating decimal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modulo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Repeating_decimal check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Repeating_decimal?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Tree traversal
What are "W", "S", "E" supposed to mean in Tree traversal? I find them rather confusing; aren't "L", "N", "R" sufficient? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Should be! W,S,E is more related to the figure, where red, yellow, green is already introduced. But there are people who are not able to distinguish colors.
 * Both, WSE and the colors are intended to explain L,N,R which is not equivalent and is closer to the literature.
 * I was very much astonished about the changes of 84.246.203.253 who apparently had not understood how it works.
 * But finally, I beat twice or even four times and of course still do not know whether it will be understood.
 * And I agree: WSE can be omitted.
 * Done. –Nomen4Omen (talk) 18:44, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red–black tree, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deletion and Insertion.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red–black tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Logarithmic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your edit at Trigonometric functions
Hello! I've just seen, in the article on Trigonometric functions, how you rearranged the table of Simple Algebraic Values, and added a couple more values; nice work! I do notice that in the new table, two rows--π/8 and 3π/8--are shaded differently from the others. Did you mean to do that? If you did, I'd be curious to know the reason (and maybe something should go in the article). If you didn't mean to do it, well, it seems to be the result of a VERY tiny coding detail--different from the others. In that case, it would be about two minutes' work to fix it. Uporządnicki (talk) 12:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)


 * @Uporządnicki: Thank you for finding this detail. It is not from me, and I do not know the reason for it. Maybe it stems from kind of a zebra table. In my opinion you may play around with it and look for some nice version or remove it. –Nomen4Omen (talk) 12:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Fixed! It was very simple, as I thought.  In those two rows, the captions and data were on the same (coding) line, separated by two pipes.  In all the other rows, after the captions, the data went on a new line which started with a single pipe.  Uporządnicki (talk) 12:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Carmicheal Function; edit reverse
Thanks for reverting that edit. Just realized that the connection between prime root modulo and the Carmicheal function is that lambda(n) is equal to the prime root modulo when lambda(n) = phi(n). Though prime root module is a math term.

LofASof (talk) 14:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * So sorry, in the source you gave, I only saw the terms «primitive root of a modulus» or «primitive root modulo», but NEVER «prime root module» NOR «primitive root module». So you would have to look for other sources to convince me. ―Nomen4Omen (talk) 14:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I mean, it was more of a comment that the term itself does exist. The original post was more of an acknowledgment of my error.

Linking to pirated books; WP:ELNEVER
Your edit to Fibonacci number has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I didn't know about the piracy. But there seems to be a comparable payable source (200 $). –Nomen4Omen (talk) 08:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Repeating decimal
I use firefox and it works perfectly. Anyway, we should not use wrong characters. --by Huhu9001 (talk) at 03:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)


 * New solution is even better! –Nomen4Omen (talk) 09:51, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Missing cite in AVL tree
You have added short cite to "Mehlhorn & Sanders 2008" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata•3 01:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Complex number, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   DVdm (talk) 19:11, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Binary search tree. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  WikiLinuz  🍁 ( talk ) 19:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

3O request
Please note that I have closed your listing at WP:3O as it was not in compliance with the instructions for requesting a third opinion. Specifically, there was no significant dialogue at the Talk page you linked to, and your listing was not phrased in a neutral manner; for example, you explicitly named the editor you were having a disagreement with. You are welcome to file another 3O request once there's been more of a dialogue, or pursue other forms of dispute resolution. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 14:14, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Arkustangens und Arkuskotangens
Jetzt sind die Belege in den Artikel Arkustangens und Arkuskotangens eingefügt, welche die Formeln mit den Kehrwerten der Zentralbinomialkoeffizienten belegen sollen. Es ist einmal der Artikel "Interesting Series Involving the Central Binomial Coefficient" von Derrick Henry Lehmer und einmal der Aufsatz "Autour de la primitive de tp coth (αt/2)" von G. Huvent. Diese beiden Quellen müssten hierfür als sehr gute Belege dienen. Und sicher weißst du, dass folgende Regel gilt:
 * $$ \arctan(x) = \arcsin\bigl(\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2 + 1}}\bigr) $$
 * Und genau dies setzte ich ganz einfach ein. Ich habe nichts weiter als das getan. Also liegt hier definitiv keine Theoriefindung vor. Hier ist nun wirklich kein Original Research vorhanden, sondern ich nahm ganz einfach diese beiden Werke heran. Die Richtigkeit dieser beiden von mir eingefügten Formeln geht sehr schnell aus diesen beiden Werken hervor. Und deswegen bitte ich dich aufrichtig darum, dass du diese beiden von mir eingefügten Formeln nicht entfernen mögest, sondern wirklich im Artikel drinnen behalten mögest. Denn diese beiden Formeln sind wirklich sehr gut. Mit aufrichtigen Grüßen! Lion Emil Jann Fiedler alias Reformbenediktiner --Reformbenediktiner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reformbenediktiner (talk • contribs) 13:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Subquotient und so, Monster group
Kukk mal! Talk:Subquotient, und schönes neues Jahr! :-) 188.195.226.36 (talk) 08:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Quotation marks differ
(A rather minor remark,  I see that you sometimes have added German-looking "Gänzefüßchen" for quotations in enwp (the English wikipedia).  However, dewp and enwp have different conventions for quotation marks; see the guideline MOS:CQ for the enwp ones. Regards, JoergenB (talk) 15:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC))