User talk:Nomian/Archives/Archive 1

Bangladeshi rock
Please see Talk:Bangladeshi rock. – Fayenatic  L ondon 18:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangladesh–Chile relations
Hello Nomian,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bangladesh–Chile relations for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 16:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangladesh–Slovakia relations


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bangladesh–Slovakia relations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Combie Tractor  20:16, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Re: Reconsideration
 Combie Tractor  20:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Bangladesh–Mauritius relations) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Bangladesh–Mauritius relations, Nomian!

Wikipedia editor Titodutta just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please add categories."

To reply, leave a comment on Titodutta's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Barnstar

 * Thank you for encouraging me. :-) Nomian (talk) 14:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Middle power
Thanks for your recent edits on middle power. It looks like a recent edit of yours changed a bunch of minor things unintentionally, perhaps because you accidentally saved an older version of the page? I have tried to restore the intermediate edits that were lost as well as maintain your changes; hopefully I haven't missed anything. Thanks, Beland (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * You have missed the most important part, someone wrongly put India in the great power list which is actually a middle power. Anyway, I am fixing it up. Regards Nomian (talk) 19:01, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Please stop adding unsourced content to articles. Adding broken links or citations to non-existent sources is not the same things as "providing sources". You have an obligation to provide sources and I have every right to remove content you have added for which a source has not been provided. Beyond that, re-adding information which is promotional in nature, badly-worded or in language that makes little sense is not productive and is plainly disruptive. I'm sorry you spent a considerable amount of time creating articles for subjects that don't meet our inclusion guidelines but that doesn't give you the right to edit-war to add unsourced content to those articles.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 20:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't know what childish game you're playing but edit-warring and then templating a regular editor with inapplicable nonesense is just silly. You are reverting edits that involved far more than the removal of non-existent references. Given your disingenuous sourcing of other articles, and given the WP:BURDEN is on you to verify the content you are trying to add, you need to use the talk pages of those articles (per WP:BRD) to gain consensus for the addition of unsourced content, poor grammar, poor English and flowery language you keep reverting the removal of. Actually have a look at the edits in question rather than just blindly edit-warring because you don't understand policy. I have no qualms about reporting you and your disruptive edits speak for themselves.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 14:53, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Stop. Now. WP:Link rot is a how-to guide, not a policy and it doesn't give you the right to edit-war to add un-sourced content and claims to articles. Your un-sourced claims have been challenged. Your next step is to take them to the talk page for discussion.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 14:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * They are not unsourced, you are just blanking these articles to have them deleted. This is clear violation of WP:Civility and WP:Assume good faith. If the links are not working then consider them as offline sources, sources don't have to be online always. And I have told you in edit summaries to google the news titles which will prove the sources exist. Nomian (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I haven't blanked a single article, in fact I added information based on the few sources that did exist and could be used to verify claims made. You're blindly edit-warring to cut-paste roll-back a series of edits because you disagree (contrary to policy) with one of them. I'm happy to assume good faith but given your disingenuous suggestions that some primary sources are secondary sources and the obvious misrepresentation of other sources to make some blatantly exaggerated claims, you no longer get a "free pass" where WP:V and WP:RS are concerned. I'm not going to "assume" the sources you say exist actually exist. You "google them", you find them, you bring them to article talk pages and you gain consensus for adding information once it can be verified. That's how this works.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 15:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Your nonsense accusations without a scrap of evidence are a clear and blatant personal attack. I request that you strike them and (again) read what has been written, read the edits made and read relevant policies.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 15:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Personal attacks are those false accusations that you are putting against me, I never made any unsourced claims. You are removing the sources, blanking the articles and now saying I added unsourced contents. This is simply disruptive. Nomian (talk) 15:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)


 * There seem to be a possible editor-targeting going on. Guys keep it civil, no need to take these things so personally. -- Zayeem  (talk) 09:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you. It came at a time when I'm going through a rough period in Wikipedia, thank you very much. Nomian (talk) 18:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem dude, Do let me know if you need any help. You can also post at WP:BDB. Thanks. -- Zayeem  (talk) 11:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, I am glad to see the righteous verdict in the DRV. :-) Nomian (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Me too :)--  SAMI  talk 05:35, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan–Bangladesh relations
Hi Nomain! I appreciate all that you done in the foreign relations articles, more so as a Bangladeshi. Bangladesh recognizing the country in 1992 or the support in territorial dispute in not noteworthy, special or notable. A more interesting article could be Bangladesh-North Korea, Vietnam, Denmark etc. I do not feel the relationship has enough content to merit a full article.I could be wrong, I remain open to changing my opinion if you can provide more content with citation, with regards Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , thanks a lot for your appreciation, it means a lot. I am actually planning to create those articles but I have had a rough time in Wikipedia recently which is discouraging me to create more articles. Actually, sources from Bangladeshi news portals are hard to come by, so I have to rely on whatever I get. Yet I found seven reliable sources with significant coverage, don't you think it's enough to be notable according to the general notability guidelines? Besides, the two countries have signed three agreements with each other. Nomian (talk) 22:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't get discouraged, you are doing good work. Even if the article is deleted, don't take it personally, it happens. If you need any help with any article please let me know. Sources are difficult, I recently worked on the seven Bir Sreshtho and it was difficult to find any source. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks bro. I will try my best. Nomian (talk) 21:00, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Look East policy
Hi Nomian. You moved Look East policy to Look East policy (India), but that is an unnecessary disambiguation. Even if Look East policy (Bangladesh) was created as suggested in, the Indian Look East policy would likely be PRIMARYTOPIC with a hatnote to Look East policy (Bangladesh) if it existed. I suggest we move Look East policy (India) back, but what do you think? — Sam Sailor Talk! 10:13, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Dear Sam Sailor, I don't think there is any primary topic for Look East policy because it's not only Bangladesh, even Saudi Arabia, Iran , Malaysia , Zimbabwe and may be some other countries also have been pursuing this policy. Several more articles may be created on this topic. So I think it will be better if we keep that disambiguation. Nomian (talk) 15:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

 * Thank you so much for remembering me. :-) Nomian (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–Croatia relations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–Croatia relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Croatia relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 00:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–the Gambia relations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–the Gambia relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–the Gambia relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 01:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–Tanzania relations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–Tanzania relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Tanzania relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 16:41, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–Papua New Guinea relations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–Papua New Guinea relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Papua New Guinea relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 02:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Bangladesh–Kenya relations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bangladesh–Kenya relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Kenya relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: July 2020
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 05:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Strikeout?
Hello, I think it is better to strikeout a talkpage comment, instead of outright removal. Here's a cup of tea while you consider it. It's better than beer, you know. Aditya (talk • contribs) 06:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I thought there wouldn't be any issue since I was editing my own comment. There was also no reply to that comment. Nomian (talk) 05:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert
Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 18:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were


 * Free Hong Kong flag.svg Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
 * 🇮🇩HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2020
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 21:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

==TheWikiWizard/Issues/September 2020==

Hello, Nomian! Here is the September 2020 issue of TheWikiWizard. To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here. We hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading & stay safe! -- Thegooduser  Life Begins With a Smile :)  🍁 00:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * What's Hot! ("working from home")
 * Articles (New One this month)
 * Interviews (New Interview!)
 * News about Wikipedia! (Wikipedia News and Updates!)
 * Editor's Notes (News/Updates!)
 * Activity Page (Activities!...)
 * Ads (Super Cool Ads)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)