User talk:Nomorebs



Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help pages

Tutorial

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Solar

Sceptics
Dear Nomorebs, I saw your comment on talk:psychic, it's good to see someone else defending the paranormal line, sometimes I do feel very alone in my position, and I am aware of editors who have left the project due to the extreme prejudice that anything to do with parapsychology evokes in these so called 'sceptics'. I do get very bored of hearing about James Randi's challenge and I do believe that supporters of this man on Wikipedia are very problematic as they seem to use name calling, strawmen arguments and generally do not uphold the civility policies, see Talk:Psychic detective for example. The important thing though is to act with integrity, fairness and to maintain the Neutral point of view policy, which works well and does allow for alternative views. I would also say that my reasoning behind the psychic article was to focus on the cultural side of things, not to start another page outlining sceptic versus other views. I’m glad you’re taking an interest and getting involved, Best wishes - Solar 09:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey Nomorebs - I commented on two things you said on the talk:psychic page (if you'd missed it). fel64 23:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the message - I assume it was yours, though you didn't sign it. It would be helpful if you could. Well, you knew the terms when you started here: Please note:

* If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it. Also, note that KSmrq was extremely civil - he made no ad hominem attacks on you, and he thoroughly explained why he disagreed with you. fel64 17:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I've replied once more - it's interesting; I never realised there was these volume of work on it. I'll look out for some of those books. Thank you - fel64 09:53, 6 June 2006 (UTC)