User talk:Nomoregoodusernamesleft

Dead links
Dead links are still usable. Check out Wayback Machine for more info. It is true that Dead Press! is defunct, but it's still usable and probably just needs archived.  danny music editor  oops 03:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I would be fine with reusing the review with the archive, although then there would be five reviews from websites that don't have their own articles. I feel like Pitchfork should replace one of them. Nomoregoodusernamesleft (talk) 03:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Serge, an admin here on Wikipedia. While I appreciate that you, unlike most new editors, are generally using sources to back your edits, but you could stand to be at least a little more subtle with what you're trying to do here. - I believe around 48 of your first 50 edits have been about adding something negative content to Machine Gun Kelly articles. And every time it's pulling the most negative aspect of the source, framing it in the most negative way possible, and generally not integrating it into the article. I've been trying to go around and cleaning up your work, but it's getting to be a lot.

While everyone is free to edit Wikipedia, please know that single-purpose accounts here to push a specific point of view or "right great wrongs" are frowned upon and if overdone, could eventually lead to your account being blocked. Please see WP:NPOV about writing Wikipedia more neutrally, and WP:QUOTEFARM about how you shouldn't be dropping direct quotes one after the other like you do.

I know he's a controversial figure, and certainly negative content needs to be present to be covering his music neutrally. And like I said, I'm trying to work with you. But you're just being so blatant and ham-fisted in your approach. I need you to help make an effort here too. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  13:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC)