User talk:Non-dropframe/Archive 8

Superjj01

How do I insert images into my article?

Satanic Minion, I Challenge Thee To Single Combat!
Foul Fiend, though stands Unmasked and revealed as the Satanic Minion thou art! Yea Indeed! Being enmeshed the Coils and Most Nefarious Designs of thy Infernal Master, thou hast Transgressed, Blasphemed and Presumed to block the True Word of God in Wikipedia! For such an Enormity of Mortal Sin there is not – and cannot be – any Forgiveness! Know, thou Wretch, thou Foul Fiend, thou Satanic Minion, that the True Word of God issues and emanates from The Most Holy Person Now Living, none less than The Most Holy Reverend Ebenezer Abel Lux, Consecrated Pastor and Prophetic Leader of the First Church of Jesus Christ Militant, to whom were vouchsafed Divine Visions and Angelic Visitations and who is Fated and Destined to Stand at the Right Hand of Christ in the Second Coming. Know, thou Wretch, that the Synod of The First Church of Jesus Christ Militant has duly resolved and commanded and commended that Wikipedia must be and shalt be Cleansed and Purified and be made a Ready and Fitting Vehicle for the True Word of God. Know, thou Wretch, that I, Thomas Lucas McGregor III, am a faithful, zealous, righteous and upright Christian soldier, a True, Faithful and Loyal Son and Knight of the Church, and that I most willingly and happily do the bidding of the Synod and of the Most Holy Reverend Lux – so help me God Almighty and the Risen Jesus Christ Militant. Thereupon I, Thomas Lucas McGregor III, Soldier of Christ, hereby challenge thou, Fould Fiend and Minion of Satan, to single combat! Yea, to to single combat! Choose your Arms and Come to Me on the Field of Tournament! You may prepare all thy Infernal Devices, you may beseech the aid of Succor of thy Foul Infernal Master – but it would avail thee Naught. For it is God Almighty who Guides my sword arm, and it Jesus’ Bright Sword of Justice which I Bear. To the Righteous shalt Victory go, yea indeed, most assuredly! I shalt meet thou on the Field of Testing and I shalt mete out to thee thy Just Deserts. Thy Earthly Husk shalt go to a miserable shameful burial in Unhallowed Ground, and thy Doomed Immortal Soul shalt go down to Total Perdition and a million million years of unceasing Hellish Torture – as thou so very richly Deserve. So be it, so be it, Amen in the Highest! So Hast God Ordained At The Very Creation Of The World, and So Verily Shalt It Be! Amen, Amen, Amen! A Wayfarer Bearing the Sword of Jesus (talk) 15:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Black List of Satanic Minions calling themselves “administrators” of Wikipedia – doomed, doomed, doomed, one and all, to Fall before the Bright Sword of Jesus Christ Militant and go down to Perdition and Eternal Hellish Torture:


 * User:Widr,
 * User:MereTechnicality,
 * User:Jake Brockman,
 * User:Non-dropframe,
 * User:JamesBWatson,
 * User:Yunshui,
 * User:Jackninja5,
 * User:Materialscientist,
 * User:Exemplo347,
 * This is amazing. Thank you. — Non-Dropframe    talk  01:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FinalCutPro.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:FinalCutPro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

User:James ville
Hi. Just a heads-up, that this other user account has apparently lifted your user page wholesale, including claims of identity, credentials, etc. I noticed because they did the same thing with my user page on Wikinews (so I'm guessing they aren't you, either). --Pi zero (talk) 13:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I have blocked the other account and posted a notice at Administrators' Noticeboard. Please respond on that posting. — Maile  (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * and, thanks much for your vigilance regarding this matter. As I noted on that board, that individual isn't me and I very much apreciate your work keeping my identity in tact. — Non-Dropframe    talk  23:42, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed you sent a message
Hi, I noticed you sent me a message about an edit I apparently made to the page Gusev, in January 2017? That was really weird because that wasn't me who made that edit. :D But apparently I seem to share this person's IP address? Confused.

Patrick Little
hi, im not sur ehow to use this properly, but my edits were correct. there is a racist attack happening against Patrick Little, by Semites, and patrick IS A CIVILS RIGHT ADVOCATE, AND AN EX MARINE. that is neutral. what isnt neutral is his personal wiki page, being locked, with racial slurs against him and his current CALIFORNIA US SENATE CAMPAIGN. The page is also locked, until 10th June, 5 days after election day. how do you explain this? Whilst im not a lawyer, i think it would be interesting to see where this stands legally in an election campaign. I understand that wikipedia has demonstrated they have no issue with people racially profiling him, for the interests of foreign countries in the senate election, but your edits are insane. "white nationalist" is not what is on the election ballots. its CIVIL RIGHTS ADVOCATE and EX MARINE. of course, using a propaganda hit piece in a ((JEWISH)) written article must surely be more credible then the election ballot itself. lolol wa sthe user who deleted patricks 18% polling data (2nd from feinstein at 1st place), from the wiki. but thats fine? are you joking? one could only assume that this would need to be taken higher up the wiki pyramid to someone who is generally neutral, and not shilling for feinstein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.36.239 (talk) 21:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * , your message to me is basically "IT'S THE JEWS!" Personally, I find that sort of bigotry disgusting. However, if you want input, I would suggest contributing to the talk pages for the articles in question in order to make your concerns known. I deal with individual edits. I am therefore neither aware of nor concerned with all of the issues you have had with associated articles. — Non-Dropframe    talk  22:21, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Removing my edit
Thiccenzie is an actual nick name for her so why did you remove my edit? Would appreciate it if you could get back to me. Therealsadcat (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, . As I'm sure you can appreciate, this nickname certainly sounds like an insult. Please add a reference in order to add the nickname. Thanks! — Non-Dropframe    talk  17:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

The nickname is insulting but that doesn't stop it from being a nick name - look at the strangle squad post on Instagram for a "reference." You'll find many people in the comments using the nick name as well as the poster themselves.

Thank you, enjoy your day. Therealsadcat (talk) 11:01, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Censorship by Google editing
You recently deleted an edit I made to the article Censorship by Google due to a current lack of a source. My information is accurate for my edit, but I am not certain how to cite it yet. I am new to Wikipedia and do not know the proper citing method currently. The source is an email form Dennis Prager's foundation, PragerU. Uraniumharvest (talk) 06:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, ! This page should tell you all you need to know regarding citing sources. Let me know if I can be of further help! — Non-Dropframe    talk  06:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Block
Can I block you from editing? --King.Of.Your.Face (talk) 17:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Belagavi vs Belgaum
Hi, I recently received your message regarding my edit to Belgaum. You should note that Belgaum has officially been renamed as Belagavi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.189.2.170 (talk) 02:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for thanking me for my edit. I always appreciate it. Rock on. UnsungKing123 (talk) 19:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

 * Ooh, that looks delicious. Thank you! — Non-Dropframe    talk  20:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

But its true
The story part about hogwarts mystery is actually true though...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iheartharrypotter12 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Franco's World
Thanks for reverting at Franco's World. This editor has become increasingly disruptive. It looks to me like he has edited a number of pages to make a hoax article seem credible. I've reported him at WP:AIV. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 22:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Edits to Paulson Manitoba
I was working my way through and had moved the information more correctly into a new article RCAF Station Paulson that will be expanded on in the coming months. The station not being part of the town. Sorry for not getting the comment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mech1949 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Mike Lester
I would like to direct your attention to this discussion regarding a BLP you have edited recently: Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard (permalink). — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  05:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

The Right Stuff June 2018
  June 2018

 FROM THE EDITOR

The Right Stuff Returns

 By

Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. And considering the recent downsizing at The Signpost the timing could not be better. The Right Stuff will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. The Right Stuff welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions here.

Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the latest updates at WikiProject Conservatism (Discuss this story) -  ARBITRATION REPORT

Russian Agents Editing at American Politics?

 By

After a series of unfortunate events largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin was the subject of an Arbitration case for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including and the notorious.

Editors who faced Enforcement action include (no action),  (three month topic ban ARBAPDS),  (no action) and  (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). (Discuss this story)

 IN THE MEDIA

Breitbart Versus Wikipedia

 By

Breitbart News, in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The article in Haaretz describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Breitbart's targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to Haaretz. There is no love lost between Breitbart and Wikipedia where editors at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to The Daily Mail. (Discuss this story) -  DISCUSSION REPORT

Liberty and Trump and Avi, Oh my!

 By

There are several open discussions at the Project:

Recently closed discussions include Anti-abortion movements which was not renamed, and an RFC at Trump–Russia dossier. (Discuss this story)
 * There is an RFC regarding Liberty University and its relationship to President Trump; see discussion
 * Activist and commentator Avi Yemini is listed at AFD; see discussion

Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

You have hurt my feelings
Can u stop bullying me. Btw plz stop. Makingwikibetter (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

The Right Stuff: July 2018
  July 2018

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> DISCUSSION REPORT

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">WikiProject Conservatism Comes Under Fire

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

WikiProject Conservatism was a topic of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the WP:Canvassing guideline.

At one point the discussion segued to feedback about The Right Stuff. Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."

Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion. Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.

Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism (Discuss this story) - <div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> ARTICLES REPORT

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Margaret Thatcher Makes History Again

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

Margaret Thatcher is the first article promoted at the new WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review. Congratulations to. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article here. (Discuss this story)

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:90%; background-color:transparent; border:none; color:#666; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; padding-top:10px; "> RECENT RESEARCH

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size:170%; background-color:transparent; border:none; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; ">Research About AN/I

<div style="font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif; font-size: 90%;"> By

Reprinted in part from the April 26, 2018 issue of The Signpost; written by 

Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a recent survey. The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "boomerang effect" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I. Some notable takeaways:


 * 53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
 * "Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
 * "Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."

In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at The Signpost and also at AN/I. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas here. (Discuss this story)

Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Live PD Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Live PD Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Please participate to the talk pages consultation
Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update
The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Buffhead.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Buffhead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Batteries
subst:Batteries for you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catpie450 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Batteries
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#334d5c; background-color:#55ad7a; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Catpie450 has given you batteries! Batteries promote WikiLove (📖💞) and hopefully this one has made your day more powerful. It is the power source best preferred by bots. 🤖 Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else batteries, whether it be someone you have had robot wars with in the past or a good friend.

Jesus Loves You And Everyone Around You!

Spread the goodness of batteries by adding {{subst:Batteries for you}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message! Catpie450 (talk) 18:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Wat
skskskms 2A03:EC00:B149:D2:0:0:0:1 (talk) 13:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)