User talk:Non-population statistics

Welcome!
Hello, Non-population statistics, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Non-population statistics, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Schminnte (talk • contribs) 08:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Non-population statistics


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Non-population statistics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 08:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Suspicious Edits
All the edits are Original Research, possibly aiming at promoting papers by W. Gardner. Wikipedia as an encyclopedia aims at representing the scientific consensus in a discipline, not the promotion of ideas and reserch. You may not be aware of Wikipedia rules, but the next edit will be reported to the Admin board. Limit-theorem (talk) 12:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Let the software number the references
It is unfortunate that you used manually numbered references in your edits to Method of moments (statistics) rather than availing yourself of Wikipedia's features that have the software do the reference numbering. The problem is that if someone inserts a new reference between (for example) numbers 49 and 50, then all of the ones after the new number 50 would have to be manually re-numbered. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:13, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Edit of Method Of Moments article
Michael, I apologize for being unfamiliar with Wikipedia editing. I just saw the need for improving the article and did the obvious, assuming Wikipedia would take care of the details, such as renumbering references.

I did not understand the purpose of the User page, so I just entered information about my qualifications that are related to the subject of the article.

I am not trying to advertise my own research. It's existing visibility is sufficient, e.g., in my Wiki Bio, and Google Scholar Citations.

If I do not have the time to learn how to use all the Wikipedia typesetting instructions, can my edits still be accepted? Non-population statistics (talk) 15:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC)