User talk:Noname1204

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Schenck v. United States, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Schenck v. United States was changed by Noname1204 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927138 on 2012-02-21T19:53:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Schenck v. United States with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. the wub "?!"  20:00, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Schenck v. United States with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. the wub "?!"  20:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)