User talk:Noname new yorker

October 2017
Your recent editing history at Visa requirements for United States citizens shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  21:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC) You should keep original version before anyone come here for editing it today.

I am not first one to edit it. I saw it is Taiwan, China for couple days already. But today, it is suddenly changed by someone.[[User talk:Noname new yorker|

You have been continually repeating the same disruptive editing that you have been warned about a number of times, first without using an account and then with this account. Since you have continued after twice being informed that doing so would be likely to lead to being blocked from editing, you will not be surprised to learn that that has now happened. When the block expires you will be welcome to edit constructively, in cooperation with other editors, if you would like to start doing so. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent disruptive editing, most recently this vandalism, where you attempted to evade scrutiny of your editing history by removing another editor's talk page message. This occurred in the context of one or more previous removals of other editors' talk page comments, as here, your recent edit warring, and the fact that you have been editing to promote a point of view over a period of more than two years (using more than one account and also editing from more than one IP address without using an account). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)