User talk:Nonfictionary

Welcome!

Hello, Nonfictionary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Fraser River
The paper you are citing does not record the flow rate of the entire river at its mouth, but only the flow rates at the monitoring station near Hope, British Columbia. Thus the numbers do not reflect the entirety of the discharge. Please use the talk Page at Fraser River to discuss the best placement of the information.--Kevmin (talk) 23:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Kevmin
you sound like an arrogant uneducated sob if you think your outdated info won't be changed again and again, well it will be. and don't threat'n people who you don't know.
 * Two points, location is just as important as date, and in this case more, as there are three major rivers which join the Fraser downstream from the Hop station, thus the overall nubers for the Fraser will be larger at the mouth then those at the station. Two I did not threaten you I noted that you had reached 3 reverts in one day, that is all.--Kevmin (talk) 15:57, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Your subsequent edit to Fraser River
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

On a personal note I would like to add that you might want to study WP:CIVIL.

Sockpuppets?
This user appears to be using at least one ip address to make edits and note that IP 207.216.216.18 has only edited the same articles and made the same/similar edits as Nonfictionary. --Kevmin (talk) 15:57, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

So i guess than the fraser rivers max outflow makes it lager than the congo river which if you were educated enough to know its not. the river would flow right over new westminister if it flowed at 139000m/s.

Alright enough is enough
I will take this to arbitration if nessary, I have provided two b.c goverment surveys on this subject and talked to hydrologist who are experts in river flow and they agree that 139,000m/s is not only impossible for the fraser river but bad scientific judgement, the first page I provided was www.pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/sci/OSAP/online/NorthHistoricalFlowsandTemperature.pdf where at Hope B.C (A place I live near)they started records circa 1912, there they measured for the 1940's flood a max flow of 15'200m/s. now where did this extra 119,000m/s come from the kanaka creek or the combination of the harrison river, green river or the larger yet Pitt river max 2400m/s and I can give you the site for that to, www.3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/112694829/abstract, so I think you can make your own conclusions from here, but check out www.fraserbasin.bc.ca/news/document/BN-LowerFraserModel-Nov14-06.pdf ,look in section three where it says 19,600m/s at new westminister.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 18:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)