User talk:Nono64/Archive 2008

FISH image
Hi Nono64, you uploaded an "international version" http: //commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:FISHtechniqueInt.JPG

of a FISH image, which is in the public domain ONLY in the United States. In other countries, including Germany, this image is NOT in the public domain and cannot be used without further permission. Your international "new" version now uses the GNU Free Documentation license, which requires an "author" to be acknowledged. You did not enter an author to that image, could you update that in the above link ? and, do you have permission to put the modified image under GFDL ? Sorry In have to be so pedantic, but I consider using the image in my PhD thesis, so the permission must be clear. Regards, Kevin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.53.52.132 ( talk ) 22:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Kevin. The problem begins with the fact that the American image has been uploaded in "commons", which is a documentation source for other countries. My second step for "internationalization" of the image should have therefore never happened. If you have to find some picture of FISH technique to illustrate your thesis, I think the best way to avoid any problem is to find something else elsewhere. I'm not sure, in this circumstances, that I must take credit for the picture. Better wait and see. Friendly, Nono.

Disambiguation page style
Please note that the style for disambiguation pages differs to that for article pages, in particular "piped links" are not used. Thanks, Rich257 ( talk ) 10:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with that rule. The question is : in what article did I do wrong? nono

Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)
Thanks for your editorial contribution to Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago). You may want to comment at Featured article candidates/Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago) .-- TonyTheTiger ( t / c / bio / WP:CHICAGO / WP:LOTM ) 15:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of A 80
A tag has been placed on A 80, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion  (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  the talk page  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bit Lordy ( talk ) 19:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Detail on University of Pau and Pays d'Adour
Hi Nono64. Your work on the article is appreciated. However, I am concerned that too much unnecessary detail is being added. If you look at articles on other universities around the world you will see that they do not usually say where every campus shop and canteen is located. Are you aware of Wikiproject Universities? There are experienced editors there who can help to get the page into shape. I'm leaving a message there. Best wishes. Itsmejudith ( talk ) 09:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Let me add a link to the project here so that I can read a bit more about it. Nono64 ( talk ) 10:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of N56
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article N56, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not " and Wikipedia's deletion policy ). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion , where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jasynnash2 ( talk ) 14:42, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Taznakhte
A tag has been placed on Taznakhte, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Taznakhte. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage ( talk ) 18:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The "Taznakhte" article doesn't appear to exist on French wikipedia. I have no way to check for the truth regarding this alleged Moroccan town. Nono64 ( talk ) 18:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

S-phrases
Hi Nono64. May I ask why you removed the brackets [ http: //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:(S1)&diff=230588635&oldid=175051250 here] and [ http: //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:(S2)&diff=230602262&oldid=175051429 here]? -- Leyo 03:11, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Was that an error? The rest of the S-Phrases codes don't have them. I thought I should remove them. If I was wrong I will put them back as soon as possible. Nono64 ( talk ) 05:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The S-phrases 1, 2, and 1/2 are the only ones with brackets. Thanks for undoing it. -- Leyo 09:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I should have opened my eyes before moving the templates. I 'm currently trying to purge the redirect links to allow the servers to edit the right phrasings in the linked articles. Sorry for it all! Nono64 ( talk ) 09:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC) but it doesn't work immediately. I will have to wait untill the servers do the task Nono64 ( talk ) 09:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Road article moves
I notice you've moved a lot of road articles recently, for no apparent reason (such as A14 road -> A14 road (England), even though the naming scheme is for Great Britain))-- I dont see any notice of intention on the article, it's talk page, on either Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Roads or even Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways . Maybe it'd have been useful had you included the reasoning or result of a discussion about it in your edit summaries, that would've avoided a lot of confusion. -- ratarsed ( talk ) 08:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops! Yes, I will add comments now. In fact I tried to get a uniform presentation for road articles among countries, like in "A5 road (disambiguation)". Nono64 ( talk ) 08:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Where was the decision made to do this? I know Wikipedia encourages people to be WP:BOLD, but there are couple of WP:WikiProject s that already look after these articles, and I can't see any discussion on either... -- ratarsed ( talk ) 10:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Well yes! I have no excuses! I wasn't aware of the project implication. Nono64 ( talk ) 10:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not move any more road articles, as you're breaking the schemes used by articles for different countries (e.g. you've turned A3 (Croatia), A7 (Croatia) and A11 (Croatia) into A3 highway (Croatia) , A7 motorway (Croatia) and A11 (Croatia) ). There are articles on English Wikipedia about Croatian highways, some expressways and some state routes, so this moving just adds to the confusion of the reader, not to mention that some countries use both terms "motorway" and "highway," but for different roads. If you want all the links to appear the same on disambiguation pages, use piped links. Admiral Norton ( talk ) 09:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Great Britain
At the very least, you should have at least renamed them to "Axx road (Great Britain)" as the numbering scheme crosses the boundaries of the constituent nations. Also, as mentioned above, you should have consulted with the relevant Wikiprojects before such a substantial mass-renaming. Very poor. — MapsMan  [  talk  |  cont  ] — 20:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you want me to do this? Nono64 ( talk ) 06:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello. You have recently been making changes to numerous pages that list A5 (road) related specifically to Wales, including the Welsh Wikipedian's Noticeboard.  Please stop these edits until further discussion can be achieved by Project Wales.  I have already moved A5 road (Great Britain) to A5 road (United Kingdom).  You have been working very hard making many changes, but it can be tricky when a number of projects are involved.  Thanks.  &#8734;&#9788;  Geaugagrrl (T) / (C) 05:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I 've finished. Nono64 ( talk ) 07:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Please continue with all your hard work. I was corrected about the page move of A5 and it has now been moved back.  Cheers. &#8734;&#9788;  Geaugagrrl (T) / (C) 12:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Just wondering
Why did you bother to have separate sections for highways and motorways (like here or here )? I thought these were different terms for the same thing. Admiral Norton ( talk ) 18:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * well, the orthography is not the same. In these sections, I tend to sort items in alphabetical order. But it doesn't imply there must be a sub-title "highways" to separate the type from the motorways, especially if, in these sections, there are only two items listed like in A4 and A7. If you want to merge the two, I don't bother. Nono64 ( talk ) 05:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

A3 roads
Good job! Thanks. Pdfpdf ( talk ) 11:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC) (Though I must admit, I was somewhat confused at first ... ) Pdfpdf ( talk ) 11:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Roads
Hi. Why are you changing the links for British roads such as the A40 road to A40 road (Great Britain). Only a few of the roads have GB in the title; as most have nothing what's the point?  Ollie Fury  Contribs   16:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well I am currently disambiguating the small number "A roads" (A1, 2, 3, 4, ...). I don't know up to what number there will be a need to disambiguate. I guess at least the first 20 could have ambiguity problem, maybe the first 100 roads, and since I was correctiong the link of a small number road in your article, I have taken care of this link also. Am I clear? Nono64 ( talk ) 16:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * So I take it that you intend to move all the British road pages from A40 road to A40 road (Great Britain) in line with other roads such as A40 road (Isle of Man) . That's fine with me.  Ollie Fury  Contribs   16:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm just begining that job. I hope I will go that far. Thanks. Nono64 ( talk ) 16:54, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

There seem to be a few issues with your recent edits. Those that I have picked up:
 * I think A road in UK road articles is better piped to Great Britain road numbering scheme ., not a list. The list does not explain what an A road is.
 * It will take time for me to assert the extend of the damage. Give me a few days for I can search and correct in my history those bad linkings of my own. Nono64 ( talk ) 22:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Your new page List of A roads systems
 * is not a disambiguation page
 * needs to clarify whether it is a list of lists or a list of road numbering systems/schemes. If it's the latter, the page needs to link to the articles which describe the systems.
 * Well, I wasn't sure until recently, and that can explain the problems. I have begun the article as a "list of A roads" and only wanted to list roads. But I changed the title as I could see there were some sort of categories or schemes existing within the roads listed. Anyway the artcle gives the (not lists) tables of roads, but it could be better placed in a section with a different title like "see also". Nono64 ( talk ) 22:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I cannot see any evidence that A roads in Australia and Argentina are numbered according to the first letter of the "state" (no Australian states begin with A)
 * Well, me neither. I will check that too. Put it in commentary for the moment. You didn't mention Alaska. Do you think there is enough evidence to maintain that in the article? Nono64 ( talk ) 22:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Alaska looks OK, see Interstate Highways in Alaska . Mhockey ( talk ) 22:42, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * A in Argentinan road stands for Autopista, like in Autopista 002 Nono64 ( talk ) 08:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

You may want to discuss on a talk page, e.g. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Highways, before proceeding. Mhockey ( talk ) 18:26, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Some of your new redirect pages do not seem to be supported by the content of the target articles, for example A1 highway (Australia), A1 highway (Bosnia and Herzegovina) , A1 motorway (Serbia) - I have only checked a few
 * I think I must have reused the links or phrasings of link of others users in these instances. Here too, I will need a few days to check it all! Nono64 ( talk ) 22:12, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with User:Mhockey here that you need to be discussing this far reaching strategy with some of the projects here. WP:UKGEO is another, in addition to WP:HWY . I have reverted your edits on one town article until consensus is reached for your proposed edits.  Coldmachine Talk 20:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Apollo 14 Talk page
Hello, I don't think it's a good idea to edit others' comments on Talk:Apollo 14, even if those comments no longer make sense. It makes it look like the author wrote something he did not. ScottJ ( talk ) 18:14, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You're right, I wasn't good on this edit. I undid my contribution and re-style it. Nono64 ( talk ) 06:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of A2 road (Kenya)
A tag has been placed on A2 road (Kenya) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion  (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  the talk page  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Burhan Ahmed ( talk • contribs ) 10:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Repost of A1 motorway (Serbia)
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Meelosh ( talk ) 14:17, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * moved the discussion in the article talk page Nono64 ( talk ) 16:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Formula One car redirects
Hi Nono64. I notice your recent creation of Arrows A1, Arrows A2 , etc as redirects to Arrows. FYI, current consensus at WP:F1 is not to create redirects such as these, so can I ask you to please not create any more similar redirects without discussing the matter at WP:F1 first? Thanks. DH85868993 ( talk ) 12:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I rapidly corrected my false moves. I turned the redirects into stub articles. See if it is OK or if it needs more work. Friendly Nono64 ( talk ) 21:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Regarding V-11
Hello! I discovered that you have redirected V-11 to ITU-T V-Series Recommendations, presumably because of "V.11". However, I do not see the relation between "V-11" and "V.11". I wish to use "V-11" for an article and I am hesitant to disambiguate the article when "V-11" is the proper term for it, whereas the redirect is not. Is my assessment of the lack of relation between "V-11" and "V.11" correct? Regards. Rilak ( talk ) 13:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have turned the redirect into a stub disambiguation page in V11. Nono64 ( talk ) 16:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my late reply. Thanks for doing that. Regards. Rilak ( talk ) 12:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

CYP1A1
Hi there! Why did you move CYP1A1 to Cytochrome P450, family 1, member A1 ? I don't think that was necessary; Wikipedia articles on cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes are always named after the abbreviation, because CYP isozymes are only ever referred to in the medical/scientific literature by their abbreviations :) Best wishes, Fvasconcellos ( t · c ) 11:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of A-1 (rapper)
A tag has been placed on A-1 (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion  (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  the talk page  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nuttah ( talk ) 17:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Signal regeneration listed at RfD
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Signal regeneration. Since you had some involvement with the Signal regeneration redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Srleffler ( talk ) 05:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Redirecting aircraft
Hi Nono64 - thanks for all the hard work you're doing on redirects and disambiguation.

One little request though – please don't redirect redlinks about specific aircraft models back to the general page on their manufacturer as you did at Slingsby Aviation. These redirects are not useful, since the articles on manufacturers generally don't contain more than a single sentence on particular models, and more frequently (as in this case) don't contain anything at all! Additionally, it creates problems for those of us maintaining and expanding Wikipedia's aircraft content.

Would you have any problem with my disabling the Slingsby redirects so we can restore the article?

Remember – redlinks are good – they help us grow. -- Rlandmann ( talk ) 20:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Undiscussed tank moves
Hi, Nono64, I noticed you've been moving Soviet tank articles to include "tank" after the name. Is there a discussion that I've missed? I've moved the articles back to their previous names, as the moves don't seem to be necessary, and they weren't discussed. Regards, Parsecboy ( talk ) 13:46, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, if an article, or especially a set of articles has been stable for a long time, that indicates that there isn't a big consensus to change the situation, and there are probably a few editors who are watching the articles. If you make a well-stated proposal for moves and post it in a good place, you may find that it will be supported.  But if you just show up and start moving around articles that others have already invested a lot of time in, you may not get a good reception. — Michael  Z. 2008-11-22 17:24 z 


 * Not to mention creating a lot of work for other editors cleaning up after ill-considered edits. Please look over WP:MOSDAB before you reformat a lot of disambiguation pages. — Michael  Z. 2008-11-22 18:10 z 


 * Specifically, please don't add multiple variations of names to the leading line, and don't add links to redirects. Don't add "and also" sections. — Michael  Z. 2008-11-22 18:20 z 


 * I feel that it's not a good sign that you're still editing links to point to articles I moved back several hours ago, and haven't responded to the comments on your talk page. Also, [ http: //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T-42_tank&action=edit redirects shouldn't point to anything other than other mainspace locations]. Parsecboy ( talk ) 18:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of D2 (clothing)
An article that you have been involved in editing, D2 (clothing), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/D2 (clothing). Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Putney Bridge ( talk • contribs ) 00:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

T-34 in the German Wehrmacht
Hy, I noticed you put a question mark behind the T-34 in the 17th Panzer Division (Germany) article. It wasn't that rare for the Wehrmacht to use captured tanks, especially when short of own ones. Under "Surviving vehicles" there is even a bit about such a tank in the T-34 article. I fixed the link in the article to directly point to the T-34 article rather then a disambiguation page. Anyway, have fun, hope this answers your question, EA210269 ( talk ) 01:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I wasn't sure about the point. Nono64 ( talk ) 10:34, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template: Number roads
Template: Number roads has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.  Rschen7754  ( T C ) 23:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Redirects
Just in case I can prevent you from doing this in the future: DO NOT MAKE REDIRECTS FROM ARTICLES TO DISAMBIGUATION PAGES, such as A1 Guadeloupe (which is one of many that I have now reversed). The redirect should go TO the best article about the topic. A person reading the disambiguation page, who clicks the link to an article for more information about the topic, should not then be given a link BACK to the disambiguation page. This is completely nonsensical. Propaniac ( talk ) 19:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)