User talk:Nonononocat

Notice
 Acroterion   (talk)   23:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

 Acroterion   (talk)   23:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Talkpages aren't a platform for you to vent your dislike of someone.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:38, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * what was the offending edit? i don't recall adding defamatory content anywhere. unless you're referring to my tagging of someone as not-notable, which i don't consider defamatory - indeed we should all be so lucky as to be not notable enough for a Wikipedia biography. i harbor no ill will toward her personally. Nonononocat (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * This . Don't abuse talkpages to call people criminals - the biographies of living persons policy applies everywhere, and neither talkpages nor articles are platforms for you to air your antipathy toward someone.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 * got it, will be more circumspect in the future. thanks Nonononocat (talk) 14:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  17:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Please explain where i edited disruptively. unless editing certain pages at all is considered disruptive, i have not done so, and do not appreciate your accusation. Nonononocat (talk) 17:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

FYI
Natureium (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Guy (Help!) 17:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 19:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)


 * i am not the IP editor JzG and others accused me of being at AN. while i find it an interesting coincidence that we've both edited articles related to New Jersey and Gary Null's biography, it will be clear from looking at my IP that i am not this person, unless it is a geographic IP and the net is spread widely (or - unlikely but possible - that it is another person using the same network as i). i don't think the latter will be the case though, as i have never edited from New Jersey, & the IP account is described as located in Metuchen. My efforts to challenge edits that are indefensible from the viewpoint of Wikipedia's own policies also don't extend to copyright violations, which the IP editor was apparently guilty of (i say apparently because their contributions were struck).

the appellation "blocked via checkuser" makes me wonder how many others have been falsely "checkusered" and blocked for socking on accounts that aren't theirs. someone should look into this. (i can see New Jersey from my house!) Nonononocat (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I never accused you of being the IP. CheckUser unambiguously linked your account with another registered account which also pushes quackery apologia. Guy (Help!) 17:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)