User talk:Nononsense101

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nononsense101/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Nononsense101/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Nononsense101/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eagleash&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Nononsense101/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 01:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I made changes, now how do I resubmit? Nononsense101 (talk) 00:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * It wasn't notable, right? Nononsense101 (talk) 19:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A confusing series (December 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A confusing series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A confusing series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:A_confusing_series Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:A_confusing_series reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1-3+9-27+...


A tag has been placed on 1-3+9-27+..., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Modussiccandi (talk) 23:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Nononsense101! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 00:51, Sunday, December 27, 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of When sources conflict


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, When sources conflict, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone 18:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Redirect targets
Hi, please don't change the target of an existing redirect - especially not to point to a page nominated for speedy deletion. I get that you're trying to be involved, but to be totally honest your actions (creating essays and unsourced pages, changing redirect targets) are coming off as more than a little disruptive. Please accept this as constructive criticism given to a new editor in good faith, and perhaps try starting a little smaller. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 18:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry. My actions were in good faith. I just wanted to give advice about what to do when sources conflict, because it wouldn't be verifiable. There is a different essay on the same toplic. I didn't see the harm of my actions. You can probably use the other, more reliable, essay. I'm a newcomer here, so I don't know what to do or what can come off as disruptive. Nononsense101 (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I can see that you definitely want to improve the encyclopedia, and I appreciate that! I think the essay you're referring to is WP:CONFLICTING. A good rule of thumb, if I may offer a bit of advice, is to check to see if the piece of information you'd like to add already exists somewhere - in this case, we've already got an essay about conflicting sources, so a second one isn't necessary. I'd also suggest that while you're new, you stick mostly to article-space, and not Wikipedia-space, which is usually for once you're more familiar with the ins and outs of how things work here.
 * As a final piece of advice, if I were you, I'd get rid of User:Nononsense101/RfA_request immediately. I spend a decent amount of time lurking around RfA polls and such, and thinking about adminship as a new user is generally considered a huge red flag. Users tend to want at least a year's tenure, if not longer, and that year needs to be solidly packed with helpful article creation, promotion of articles to GA or FA, usually some AfD work, and the like.
 * I hope this didn't come off as harsh or rude; I can definitely see that you're editing in good faith and I feel like you could be a really valuable addition to the project! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 19:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I forgot the shortcut. Nononsense101 (talk) 19:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I check articles and put maintenance tags.
 * You could help me with the ins and outs of Wikipedia.Nononsense101 (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I got rid of the content at User:Nononsense101/RfA_request and tagged it for deletion under CSD U1.

I actually created a template for conflicting sources.

I Want to Help
I'm just getting involved in the encyclopedia and want to help by contributing.

"Source conflict" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Source conflict. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. JBL (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Lettler. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lettlerhello • contribs 23:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Nonsense categories
Hello,

Please don't create unnecessary categories like Category:Articles needing additional references from 00:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC). The category structure is a hierarchical navigation system and any new categories have to fit into the existing category structure. This category doesn't make any sense.

If you want more information about categories on Wikipedia, please read Categorization. For more general questions you might have or advice on how you can help here, I encourage you to visit the Teahouse. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Source conflict
Template:Source conflict has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:When sources conflict
Wikipedia:When sources conflict, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:When sources conflict and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:When sources conflict during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:A confusing series
Hello, Nononsense101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A confusing series, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2.9200...
Hello, Nononsense101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2.9200..., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

"2/0" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2/0. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 04:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

"2.9200..." listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2.9200.... The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 16:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of LifeWiki for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LifeWiki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/LifeWiki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  17:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Question for you
Why do you want to be an admin? Your account is pretty young and per your own userpage you've got barely over 300 edits, but in two different places on your userpage you note that adminship is something you're interested in.

To perhaps put this in some perspective for you, my own account has been around since 2014, has just over 5,500 edits, and I wouldn't have a chance at RfA.

Just curious about your adminship aspirations! NekoKatsun (nyaa) 17:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Twinkle
Hi, I noticed that you don't seem to have set up Twinkle and I wanted to recommend it to you. Twinkle is a gadget that makes a number of editing tasks easier. For example, when you want to tag an article as you did here, you can use Twinkle's dropdown menu to select the tag that you want instead of typing it all manually. It also makes it easy to revert vandalism as well as open the editor's talk page automatically to give them a warning. There's no installation, you just have to activate it in your preferences. Happy editing! Schazjmd  (talk)  22:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2.9200...


Hello, Nononsense101. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2.9200...".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Adoption proposal
I noticed you want to be an admin someday. One good quality of admins is knowing how to revert vandalism, and that's been my strong spot for 1 1/2 months. If I adopt you, I can teach you not only vandalism reversions but also a few other things admins do.  interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 14:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC) OK Nononsense101 (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: NOMINATING TO DELETE Y238
 * First, sign your post. SEconnd, I nominated in good faith. Third, I'm fine with getting whacked.Nononsense101 (talk) 15:19, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: Nominating this article for deletion. Obviously notable topic. Cranloa12n / talk / contribs / 00:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

SuggestBot
Just decided I would check out SuggestBot. I got the following: Nononsense101 (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)