User talk:Nonsenseferret/AFC

If you are here seeking advice about a declined your AfC request, then read on. The common reasons for declining with a bit of explanation are below:

Sourcing
If your article has been declined due to lack of reliable sources:
 * Your article does not have any sources.
 * Solution: Add reliable sources to the article.


 * Your article has sources, but all or most of them are:
 * Blogs
 * Solution: Remove blogs, as they aren't reliable sources.
 * Other Wikis (such as Wikia, or Wikipedia itself)
 * Solution: Remove these as sources, Wikipedia does not consider itself to be a reliable source, nor similarly any other wiki
 * Forums
 * Solution: In 99.9% of cases anything that is a forum will not be an acceptable source. The one exeption to this is if the forum is a) run by a company and has very strict regulation about what is posted where.. b) used to show commentary by average people in an article. Otherwise, remove forums.
 * Sources affiliated with subject
 * Solution: Wikipedia does not allow sources affiliated with subjects to be used as the only/main sourcing of an article. Find independent, third-party sources before resubmitting.
 * Sources are to social networks, Facebook, Linked-in, Myspace,
 * Solution: Social networks are never reliable sources, remove these.
 * Sources are to local news stations
 * Solution: I only decline these if the only sources are to a local news station. If only a few are to local news, it's usually acceptable
 * Sources are op-eds (opinion pieces or letters to the editor, etc.)
 * Solution: Op-eds are not reliable sources, as they are someone's opinion on a subject.
 * Exception: If you have a few op-eds as references under a "criticism" or "reception" section, I will overlook them more than likely.
 * Solution for all sourcing: Find independent, third-party, reliable sources and then resubmit article for review.


 * Your article has some good sources, but they are bare links.
 * Solution: Format links with information that can help readers find source even if Link rot occurs.


 * Some other reason in which I said "sourcing"
 * Solution: I may have made a mistake. Please review your article and then if you find no problems, post on my talk page. Include a link if possible.

Notability

 * Your article has been declined due to not establishing notability
 * Solution: Add reliable sources (see above) that establish notability. There isn't a specific number of sources required, to some extent it depends on the qualify of the coverage, but note 'multiple' references to independent significant coverage in reliable sources are required, and your article cannot be accepted without these.

Writing Style

 * your submission is declined as it reads like an essay
 * Solution: Rewrite your article with an encyclopedic tone. Use a lead paragraph, and then seperate the information into relevant heading. Add an infobox if applicable.


 * your submission does not meet NPOV
 * Solution: Rewrite your submission without having it sound like it is in favor (or not in favor) of the subject. Some words to avoid: Amazing, Awesome, Awe-inspiring, love, hate, best, worst, hottest, passion,best, worst, greatest, noble, inspirational, etc.


 * your submission sounds like an advertisement
 * Solution: Rewrite removing any promotional material. An encyclopedia is not a place to try to get sales leads.


 * your submission is a plot summary
 * Solution: Add other sections. Some examples include "History", "Cast", or "Reviews" (be careful on reviews to provide both sides, good and bad).


 * Submission fails WP:NOT
 * Solution: Your submission is something Wikipedia is not. Go check out that policy for advice on how to fix it.

Major Issues

 * Submission fails BLP policy
 * Solution: Read WP:BLP. Make appropriate changes and resubmit.


 * Submission is an attack page
 * Solution: None. Your page has been blanked. Feel free to try to submit again as a non-attack page.


 * Submission is a joke
 * Solution: None. Don't put joke pages here.


 * Submission is a dictionary definition
 * Solution: Try submitting at Wiktionary.


 * Submission is blank
 * Solution: Put some content in the article before submitting it.


 * Submission is a test
 * Solution: WP:Sandbox for testing


 * Submission is a copyright violation
 * Solution: Do not copy-paste. Rewrite in your own words.


 * Submission is a news report
 * Solution: Go to WikiNews or rewrite with encyclopedic tone.

Others

 * Not in English
 * Solution: Go to the Wikipedia of the language you are posting in


 * Redirect request
 * Solution: Go to Requests for Redirects


 * Already exists
 * Solution: There is already an article on this subject, it is best if you look carefully at the existing article and add any extra relevant content to that article.


 * Can be merged
 * Solution: Your submission is too short to stand alone, but may have a place within an already made article


 * Duplicate
 * Solution: Check the other one, it may have been accepted.

Custom/Not here
Post on my talk page.

Include
 * 1) Link to submission
 * 2) Exact reason I declined
 * 3) What, if anything, you've done to better the submission
 * 4) When I declined it (in the declined template at the top/bottom of submission)