User talk:Noogloo/Archives/2022/September

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul J. Tesar (November 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul J. Tesar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paul J. Tesar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Paul_J._Tesar Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Paul_J._Tesar reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Marissascavuzzo (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC) November 22, 2019 Thank you AngusWOOF    for your review, I have made these changes and hope the page is now improved and meet Wikipedia standards.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul J. Tesar (January 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul J. Tesar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paul J. Tesar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Paul_J._Tesar Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Paul_J._Tesar reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 21:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  DGG ( talk ) 21:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello Marissascavuzzo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Paul J. Tesar, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Marissascavuzzo. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * It's obvious that know Tesar, because you claim to have taken this rather professional photograph of him. Question: if you took that photograph, why did you not upload the original version of it with the original EXIF data? (i.e., the version from your phone or camera)? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, you so much for your comments. I’m studying at the university and in the lab. This I know Paul well, but have absolutely no affiliation with his company or any firm working for it. I am an academic and do not get paid for anything I do on Wikipedia. I am doing this in good faith with no intention of promotion, just to get information out there on a clearly prominent scientist who I am surprised doesn’t already have a Wikipedia page. I also have not used another username here. My username is my name and my intent was never to be deceptive or to promote his company; I am being very transparent by using my real first and last name as to my association and pay source (from a postdoctoral fellowship, all of this information is available if you were to google my name). I’m new to Wikipedia and am still learning the process and standards. Everything that I wrote was pulled from websites and press releases, and I may have accidentally used the same tones of the sites I read from, which came off promotional. I can see that the article needs to be rewritten in a more neutral and encyclopedic tone and differently from other Wikipedia pages that I looked at for inspiration which may have been older, or the news sources I used to get the information. The edits I have made may have not been the best as it is my first article and I am just doing this for fun for stress relief and to learn the process. Again, my intention was never to be deceptive or for promotion purposes. I’m excited to work on this draft and continue to improve it according to Wikipedia’s standards. Thank you again for your feedback and help, I really appreciate it. Marissascavuzzo (talk) 01:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Also I should note that I did not take this picture, I asked someone in Paul Tesar’s department if they had a photo that looked nice and would fit the requirements for photo here (like that nobody needs to be paid or cited or anything). Again I’m just making the page for fun and for learning purposes so if I have done this wrong just let me know I am happy to learn how to do it correctly Marissascavuzzo (talk) 01:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi again! Thank you for clarifying. We discourage conflict-of-interest editing precisely because it is so difficult to write dispassionately about a topic one has a strong interest in. In case it's of use as an example, this is a page I wrote about a notable academic (after deleting an inappropriate page on him). I suggest that in this case, as in modernist architecture, "less is more" – a few sentences of surgically dispassionate prose are worth more than a page of eulogy. Since you are not the copyright holder of the two images, I have marked them as missing permission (see below). The actual copyright holder (which in almost every case is the photographer) can, if he/she wishes, send permission for them, preferably after uploading them to Wikimedia Commons; they will otherwise be deleted after seven days. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PaulJTesar CWRU 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PaulJTesar CWRU 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:PaulJTesar CWRU.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PaulJTesar CWRU.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul J. Tesar has been accepted
 Paul J. Tesar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sulfurboy (talk) 02:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Paul_J._Tesar help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Welcome!
Hello, Marissascavuzzo, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! North America1000 07:35, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

COI

 * I copied the COI declaration to your User page, considered a better place. If you know who Gemma100 is, that person should probably also declare COI, as the only article editing is Paul's. David notMD (talk) 23:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Marissascavuzzo Please see David notMD's question in the non-striked through line and let us know so we can take appropriate action please.


 * Galendalia Gemma100 is a friend who helped me try to figure out how to create my first page. She is not associated with the page and stopped working on it once I figured things out. Marissascavuzzo (talk) 14:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

✅ Thank you so much for your help. Can I remove the header now that COI is declared properly? Or can you remove it if that is better? Thank you again for your help. Marissascavuzzo (talk) 02:17, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Please make sure you fully understand WP:COI. It is highly discourged for you to make any changes to the article. We will use the criteria laid on the talk page for Talk:Paul_J._Tesar, As we go through this, I will need you to work with me. You should only be posting to the talk page and I will do the actual work on the article for you at this time to avoid an conflicts of edits (where we over-write each other). Can you please let me What country you are in, your time zone, and have if you have any times you are not available please? I am mostly available all day tomorrow and the weekend. I live in San Diego, CA, US and if you look at my page you will see a clock at the top that will tell you my current time. You can also call me Chuck, however, always remember to ping me under my user name and to sign your signature by typing a space and 4 ~ so the ping will go through. Thanks and this is going to be fun. For now since it is a starter, we are going to start slow so I put it up to a C level and that may change as we work on the document. It is always great to reach for the stars and try to get it an A article, but again, baby steps. I will see you soon. --GalendaliaChat Me Up 08:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

CE Complete
Hi

The Copy Edit has been completed. Please see the talk page for Paul_J._Tesar for additional comments.

--GalendaliaChat Me Up 08:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi ! Thank you so much for all your work on my article. I really appreciate it!! I noticed the tags have been added again by another user. What else can be done? I think the article is written in a neutral tone and is encyclopedic. I can see there the first paragraph is similar to his bio, but I do not see another way they can be written. What are the next steps here? And, once the tags are removed, how do we proceed? Thank you again for all your hard work! Marissascavuzzo (talk) 12:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I started to change it, but then I realized the numerous changes that and  made so I am deferring this to them to finish the article editing, which is why it that tag is back because it was tagged by them. Apologies for that as I feel they should have notified you about this! I did make a test "Early life..." of ""Tesar was born in Cleveland, Ohio.[6] He graduated with a Bachelor of Science in biology from Case Western Reserve University in 2003. Tesar then attended the University of Oxford after obtaining the esteemed National Institutes of Health scholarship, where, after studies under the embryologist Richard Gardner at Oxford and under Ron McKay at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, he earned a Doctor of Philosophy in 2007.[7][8] While a graduate student, he published the discovery of epiblast-derived stem cells, a new type of pluripotent stem cell,[8] research for which he received both the Beddington Medal of the British Society for Developmental Biology[9] and the Harold M. Weintraub Award of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.[10]'" keeping the citations and such in place which should resolve the close paraphrasing issue. GalendaliaChat Me Up 16:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi no worries, thank you for the update. I think your changes above resolve the paraphrasing issue. Thank you again for all your help with my article!! Marissascavuzzo (talk) 18:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! Marissascavuzzo, I've already dealt with the close-paraphrasing problems in that paragraph … please be careful from now on to write entirely in your own words without borrowing from the source(s)., there's really no need to insert WP:PUFFERY like "esteemed" or to turn "BSc" into "Bachelor of Science" – excessive use of capital letters is one of the commonest symptoms of promotional/COI editing (and one of the easiest to fix). Thank you for restoring the earlier version of that text, and also for your earlier work on that page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * So, here's a thought, Marissascavuzzo: why don't you see if you can get someone to donate a photograph of him that makes him look a bit more like a serious and very notable scientist, and a bit less like those advertisements for cheap dental care in Croatia? Perhaps you could even take it yourself? I see that there are plenty of better images on the internet, but it may not be easy to obtain permission for those. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I find your above comment to be very derogatory and I hope that you or another editor would consider removing it from my page. I am new to wikipedia and have been working with many helpful editors like and  to learn the system and work on the page. Insulting comments seem unnecessary and I hope the community does not support this type of inappropriate behavior.

I did some more revising (mostly cutting) and ref removal, and then removed the paraphrasing tag. I also removed the COI tag because the article has been through so many changes after Marissacavuzzo ceased editing. David notMD (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2020 (UTC)