User talk:Nooksz

Nooksz (talk) 18:50, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to God Is Not Great, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: God Is Not Great was changed by Nooksz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912957 on 2011-10-19T08:02:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

You were asking a reasonable question. However, notes like that should be put on the talk page rather than in the article page. --Javaweb (talk) 10:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Javaweb

Christopher Hitchens
Your question was a reasonable one. It was discussed at God is Not Great article talk page. After reviewing the discussion, if you have anything you want to to add, please append it to that discussion. I would be happy to discuss it with you as well. I originally felt the way you do. However, the publisher's catalog has the first letter of the title capitalized so that is the convention the article followed. You will be happy to see that the book article has a picture of the cover with 'god' in lower case. --Javaweb (talk) 10:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Javaweb

Orphaned non-free image File:Gmfolkscorvette4a.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gmfolkscorvette4a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gmfolkscorvette5a.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gmfolkscorvette5a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

March 2021
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Russell Johnson, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox.  Please see Help:Show preview Eric talk 14:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Disruptive behavior
In Talk:Francis Collins, you labelled another user's comment with a title calling him a "delusioned Christian" who wants to "rape" the so called "legacy" of Christopher Hitchens. Your behavior violates multiple Wikipedia rules, most notably WP:AGF and WP:PA. Wikipedia is not a battleground. The comments made by others whom you attacked were perfectly rational and were concerning an actual topic of the article. Wikipedia does not care about anyone's legacy. As long as any information are reliable and valid, the statements which state that information are also valid. Whether this affects the "legacy" of the said individual doesn't matter. Wikipedia does not allow fanaticism as you showed. Please, do not behave like this again. Asaduzzaman Khan Shahriar (talk) 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)