User talk:Noommos/Archive2011/February

Boom
slap —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.28.195.97 (talk) 17:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Dodge Noom  talk 17:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, this is just to let you know that I've granted you Rollback rights. Just remember:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You may wish to display the User wikipedia/rollback userbox and/or the Rollback top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, please do let me know.

  Wifione    .......  Leave a message  03:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. :) Noom  talk contribs 03:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

This is an educational disgrace.
I have just spent a good deal of my time imparting my knowledge on the subject of 'My Pingas and it's threat to human civilisation' For some reason you have felt the need to delete this and threaten me with a ban, I consider this an absolute outrage and I'd kindly ask you to step in my office, because you're fucking fired. That is all, clear you shit up and get the fuck out.
 * Please calm down whilst I see what your edit was, and I'll provide you with my reason for removing it. Noom  talk contribs 04:12, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Your edit was blatant vandalism. Consisting of a link to an unrelated site, a non-NPOV and blatant nonsense. Noom  talk contribs 04:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Drop in at WP:ANI if you face any further personal attacks. Take care.  Wifione    .......  Leave a message  07:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

IP Comment
someone need to fix the mac miller page cuz it calls a mixtape a "wigger" album...thats racist u fuc faces and a slam at mac miller —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.67.160.103 (talk) 22:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Please refrain from profanity and try not to vandalise the page whilst I have a look and see what you're talking about. Noom  talk contribs 22:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I noticed the comment while patrolling and have removed the content the person objects to. -- Diannaa (Talk) 22:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Diannaa. Noom  talk contribs 22:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

i couldnt edit that part.. it wouldn't let me... sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.67.160.103 (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

You're back!
Log on IRC when you have a chance, I've made some tweaks to the templates the bot should know about. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * The breakdown on Book talk:Aerosmith is way off. There are 153 articles in the book, and yet the bot report things like 375 start-class and 148 stubs. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Doing test edits in the bots userspace again. Attempting to speed it up and checking out some issues with large books and losing track of which articles in which section. Noom  talk contribs 19:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Cool. I'm on IRC if you need to talk. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 19:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

NoomBot2
For all your hard work on NoomBot's second task, and making book reports, such as this one, a reality. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, Headbomb :). Moved to user page to prevent it being archived. Noom  talk contribs 23:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

NoomBot book report issue
I noticed that in this edit, NoomBot inserted a book report into the middle of a WikiProject banner template, which broke the display of the template. Also, I notice that the book report that was generated skipped the very first article of the book, which is the main article about the subject. (It is also has a "GA" assessment, so the omission probably lowered the overall "score" of the book report, though probably not by much.) I moved the report so it doesn't break the banner anymore, but haven't added the missing article into the report yet.

This was my first time seeing the "book report" concept. It seems like a great idea, but the bot might need a little tweaking. --RL0919 (talk) 16:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing this out, I'll ensure its fixed before the botrs next run. Noom  talk contribs 16:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Bug resolved, see Noombots bug report page. Noom  talk contribs 00:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!
Mnicolosi (talk) 02:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)