User talk:NoonIcarus/Archive 9

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello , The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day. won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
 * Backlog
 * 2022 Awards

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from  to  '''

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as and  have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.


 * Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas (February 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Juan_Pablo_Pe%C3%B1a-Rosas Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Juan_Pablo_Pe%C3%B1a-Rosas reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Cortés Quero has been accepted
 Manuel Cortés Quero, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Manuel_Cort%C3%A9s_Quero help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Pbritti (talk) 19:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of LegalEagle (YouTuber)


The article LegalEagle (YouTuber) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a notable person: the sourcing is terrible, none of the secondary sources discuss the subject in any detail. There's no inherent notability either in this puff piece (which had the company he works for linked as an official link), and being nominated for one award doesn't confer it either."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 02:58, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Reconstrucción
Hello, NoonIcarus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reconstrucción, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:11, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Leisha Medina
Hello, NoonIcarus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leisha Medina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Ecured
Hello Noonicarus, I see that you erased +350 times ecured as source, stating '' 'User generated source. Unreliable.' '' This is known to be the case for many wikis, just like this wikipedia.org. Nevertheless, it often does not have to be an obstacle to refer to ecured. Either inline or as a general external link related to the topic at the end of the article. Wikipedia about references:' ''The reliability of a source depends on context. Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content.' '' For you removed ecured 350 times in just a couple of minutes I presume you haven't read one word of the articles that are involved. RenaatPeeters (talk) 12:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for your time. Per WP:RS/P, Wikipedia should not be used a reference for itself for the states reasons. If the community has decided against its use for references and external links, there shouldn't be a reason to use EcuRed, which besides having user generated content is written focused specifically with the perspective of the Cuban government, particularly when there are many other sources available. This brings issues not only related to verifiability, but to neutrality as well. --NoonIcarus (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for replying. I'm going to try to clarify myself because I think I'm not understood. To my believe the policy of wikipedia regarding reliable sources is the context. Context matters tremendously when determining the reliability of sources, and their appropriate use on Wikipedia. Sources which are generally unreliable may still be useful in some situations. For example, even extremely low-quality sources, such as social media, may sometimes be used as self-published sources for routine information about the subjects themselves. Therefor, to my opinion, one can't erase sources without looking at their context. I think you have to agree as this is policy.
 * Although wikipedia and ecured.cu use the same wiki software, there is more that sets them apart than they have in common. E.g. one of the reasons for not using wikipedia as a source is the anonymity of the editors, as a reason to doubt its reliability. On ecured.cu there aren't anonymous editors. And you wrote: '(ecured) is written focused specifically with the perspective of the Cuban government'. I don't want to discuss this, but one might not forget that wikipedia's editing model facilitates multiple systemic biases: namely, selection bias, inclusion bias, participation bias, and group-think bias, etc. So to me it seems a clumsy argument that ecured can't be used because 'the community has decided against (the) use (of wikipedia.org) for references and external links'.
 * So I believe it's your personal opinion and not that of the wikipedia community that ecured.cu is that unreliable that all traces should be erased, even without regards to the context as you did on 3 and 4 august 2022. RenaatPeeters (talk) 09:26, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I was looking forward responding this, sorry for the delayal. Since you're citing WP:CONTEXTMATTERS, I'm wondering how in these cases it's alright to use Ecured, specially when there are other independent and more reliable sources available.
 * WP:GUNREL specifically mentions that outlets with user-generated content are generally unreliable, and WP:RS/P has a long history of concluding that sources with these characteristics are unreliable: Ancestry.com, Answers.com, Crunchbase, Daily Kos, Discogs, Encyclopaedia Metallum, FamilySearch, Find a Grave, Goodreads, IMDb, Know Your Meme, Last.fm, Quora, Reddit, Urban Dictionary and of course, Wikipedia, just to mention some, and EcuRed's template was deleted for the same reason last year (Templates for discussion/Log/2022 June 9), meaning this is just not my personal opinion. --NoonIcarus (talk) 11:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Equatorial Guinea–Kosovo relations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Equatorial Guinea–Kosovo relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Equatorial Guinea–Kosovo relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Joy (talk) 12:30, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Coup template
Considering the recent edits at Template:Coup d'état, there needs to a clean-up. Again. -- Minoa (talk) 23:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Af, just noticed. Do you think bring the discussion to the involved users will help? We could restore to the last stable version, but I also don't want to be too drastic. --NoonIcarus (talk) 23:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You may decide, as I am too depressed to handle modern political topics, especially since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. So I decided to flag the issue for your attention. -- Minoa (talk) 00:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to hear that, and truth be told I don't really blame you. Heads up, though, as hope is the last thing we lose. I have restored a stable version and notified involved editors, hopefully it will go alright. Best wishes! --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Forgot the ping! --NoonIcarus (talk) 08:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
Hello , Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by  and  with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of, and also some patches from , has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and on IRC.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

DYK for Unicorn hunting
Hey @NoonIcarus, I stummbled on your article while reviewing redirects and was wondering if you wanted to expand this article a bit and submit it to WP:DYK?  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 05:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Wow, that'd be awesome! I'm not sure in which ways to precisely eexpand it, but I'm sure there's plenty of material and I'll take a look at the new added sources. Many thanks in advance! --NoonIcarus (talk) 09:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @NoonIcarus Sounds good, I'll see what I can add to it after work today. I was able to find some peer reviewed sources and a couple books that I already added. I'll check some of the newspaper archives if they're online and see if I can find anything interesting there. It's always fun to go into the archives, you never know what you'll find!  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 17:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Absolutely :) Thank you very much! --NoonIcarus (talk) 22:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey @NoonIcarus just wanted to touch base real quick and say I didn't forget about this. Work ran over today but I have a half day tomorrow so I'll make this a priority.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 05:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay, I wasn't able to reach back until now. I've nominated the article for DYK before a week after its creation passed and it was turned ineligible, but I still want to expand the article and possibly add an alternat hook. Looking forward to know your thoughts :) Kind regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 11:04, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello , The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by using  at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Unicorn hunting
—Kusma (talk) 22:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Punnany Massif moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Punnany Massif. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Significa liberdade (talk) 14:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Coup template, again
Source

I think the template needs Semi-PP at this rate. I haven't got the time to handle this any more. -- Minoa (talk) 03:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Best wishes, I hope you're doing alright. I wanted to do some chores before responding: I restored the last version, created a template for plots and conspiracies, Requests for page protection/Increase and requested the semiprotection of the template. Hopefully these changes can help to improve the situation. Please let me know if I can help in any other way. Kind regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Quick note
When bringing closure reviews to the administrator's noticeboard, it's generally good practice to let the person whose close you are appealing know that you are bringing them to the noticeboard. I've done so here for you, but please remember to do this if you appeal a closure going forward.

Happy editing!

— Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 23:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, kind regards. Thank you very much, and I am so sorry: switching between three discussions at the same time, and with the closer saying that an appeal could be started, I forgot or took for granted that they were informed. Probably I won't need to in the near future, but I'll definitely take more care with it in the future. Once again, sorry and thanks: Best wishes! --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

WikiLeaks edit
As an act of good faith, I wanted to inform you about this edit. After reviewing WP:BLP, I believe that I presented the information in a neutral manner while sticking to the sources, though I wanted to notify you to see if you had any concerns. This message was also shared with. Thanks! WMrapids (talk) 05:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you kindly. In principle I think the content is alright, but it might be better off merged into another section as part of his career. Other coverage on the issue might be interesting, given that Bocarada is far from being the only journalist that investigated links between the guerrillas and the Colombian government. --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:21, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas


Hello, NoonIcarus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Dancing Devils of Yare
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Dancing Devils of Yare, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirectedto Dancing devils of Corpus Christi. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page. Please see the edit summary for a more detailed rationale: Special:Diff/1171207424. Sincerely —Alalch E. 17:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK nomination of Parque Central Complex fire
Hello! Your submission of Parque Central Complex fire at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 22:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Plan Ávila explanation
Can you explain the removal of this source and the removal of this information? The book from the first edit appears fine and the content removed from your second edit was easily accessible through an archive URL. WMrapids (talk) 21:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, kind regards. In the case of the second removal, since it happened over two years ago, I can't remember precisely, but as you well pointed out, the link was dead and I think I could not find the archived link, and RCTV's source did not mention the Pope's visit. As for Bart Jones' book, it is noticeably biased, to the point of affecting its reliability. I can provide examples of it if needed, but in the meantime I can start by providing this interview in Venezuelanalysis: Q & A With Bart Jones, Author of the New Chavez Biography "Hugo!". --NoonIcarus (talk) 09:54, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Simón (2023 film)
—Kusma (talk) 12:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter
Hello ,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:Female Venezuelan senators
Hello, NoonIcarus,

Category redirects are created differently than article redirects. Please look at the code on this page so that the proper template can be used if you find yourself needing to create one in the future. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Agh, I had the feeling that the redirect page looked different from what I recalled. Many thanks! I'll bear it in mind for future categories. Kind regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 09:51, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Helen Hindpere
I removed the request due to lack of notability. The Inverse article is entirely about Disco Elysium, not about her. The EPL article only mentions her in brief, and the Pohjarannik article seems to be about someone else entirely unrelated. TarkusAB talk / contrib 18:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * That's alright, I made the request just in case more coverage about her could be found and it was deemed appropriate for an article. Thank you kindly for the notification. Best regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
WP:VENRS that you cited while removing a ref from various articles (such as this) doesn't apply to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Could you please self-revert? Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 11:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Kind regards, thank you for your message. My removals were based in part in my experience in using the foreign affairs ministry as a reference in the past. I created all of Venezuela's bilateral relations articles in Spanish, where I often had to use mppre.gob.ve but would usually stumble upon mistakes for even basic facts, such as dates. Government sites in Venezuela are also often outdated, making them unreliable for data such as embassies and visa information. These articles could really benefit from independent sources. However, if you remain unconvinced, I can proceed with the self revert. Best wishes, --NoonIcarus (talk) 11:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I think it would be best if you could self-revert. Best, M.Bitton (talk) 11:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅. Kind regards, NoonIcarus (talk) 11:37, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Is there a reason why you self-reverted just one of them? M.Bitton (talk) 11:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

My bad, I thought that you asked for only that specific self-revert. I would have liked if you could have waited for my response, though, or at least 24 hours before reverting: your changes have included articles about Venezuela, and you have not responded to my unreliability concerns. I can add the ministry as an entry to WP:VENRS and provide alternative references to some of the articles, but the referencing in the pages must improve. --NoonIcarus (talk) 16:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I didn't wait because I was aware of the fact that subsequent edits to the articles would have made the reversion more difficult than it has to be. Also, I honestly didn't think you'd mind. The reliability of a source depends on context and has to be judged on a case by case basis. Adding it to WP:VENRS won't make it unreliable, let alone blacklist it (unlike WP:RSN, that list is just an essay). Best, M.Bitton (talk) 23:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for the information. While WP:VENRS is an essay, it is still a case of WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, and concerns were still raised about the references reliability. At any rate, I will try to provide alternative references in the future and continue approaching the articles in a case to case basis. Kind regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Carolina Chang moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Carolina Chang. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  141 Pr  {contribs} 10:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Caracas Chronicles
Not sure why you have previously criticized the source, yet you use it for an exceptional claim. Can you find a better source? WMrapids (talk) 23:39, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't recall having criticized the source, maybe you're thinking of Sandy? Quite the opposite, if you take a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Venezuela/Reliable and unreliable sources, you will confirm that I have explained the source's reliability and advocated for its use. At any rate, I have added additional references. --NoonIcarus (talk) 07:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! And maybe I was mistaken, just wanted to make sure that we have the best sources present. WMrapids (talk) 17:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries! --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled right granted
Hi NoonIcarus, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! &oelig; &trade; 08:20, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * This is such a pleasant surprise, thank you so much! --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia page for CiberCuba.com
Hola NonIkarus, soy Luis Flores, el director de CiberCuba, y te escribo para preguntarte si podrías ayudarnos a crear la página de Cibercuba en Wikipedia. Cada vez que la hemos enviado, ha sido eliminada. Creemos que el medio de comunicación independiente más influyente de Cuba debería estar en Wikipedia.

¿Podrías ayudarnos con esto?

Saludos y gracias. Luis 5.224.201.100 (talk) 19:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ecured
EcuRed is perfectly valid as an WP:EL, which follows a different policy from WP:RS. Also, next time you remove thousands of references in hundreds of articles, maybe you could replace them with the sources listed in EcuRed (if any) or others, rather than leaving a mess behind. Many obscure Cuban cultural topics are pretty much only accessible online thanks to librarians from Cuba who wrote those EcuRed articles, with proper sources and all, including references to birth certificates and local publications only available in print at their libaries. Just my two cents. Neodop (talk) 02:04, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi. Sorry, I forgot to respond to this. As a source with user generated content, I frankly see little value of its inclusion, even as an external source, and at some points it has created even more problems than those solved. Many of the articles in question had to mention two birth dates or years due to conflicting accounts provided by EcuRed. There are surely many other available resources online other than EcuRed for these historical sources. Best wishes, --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive
 Hello NoonIcarus:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolina Chang (November 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carolina Chang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Carolina_Chang Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiOriginal-9&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Carolina_Chang reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Carolina Chang has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carolina Chang. Thanks! – Novem Linguae (talk) 17:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reconstrucción has been accepted
 Reconstrucción, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Reconstrucci%C3%B3n help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:25, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Deaths in Caracas has been nominated for deletion
Category:Deaths in Caracas has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Dispute resolution
Wanted to inform you about a dispute resolution discussion regarding La Salida. WMrapids (talk) 00:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice. I added my summary. Regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Coatrack reminder
You may be incorrectly using the essay WP:COATRACK to justify your removal of information from articles. previously raised a concern about this behavior, which still has not been addressed. As a reminder from WP:COATRACK: "Material that is supported by a reliable, published source whose topic is directly related to the topic of the article, is not using the article as a coatrack." WMrapids (talk) 07:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi. If I recall correctly, you're referring to this edit in the Rupununi uprising article, which I have already explained at Talk:Rupununi uprising. As you mentioned, this information is unrelated to the topic at hand, and which is particularly troublesome when it seeks to portray Venezuela as an aggressor instead of merely provided more context about the territorial dispute. I'd appreciate it if you didn't link comments with different context to these questions (both here and in general), specially because in this case CVDX only asked for more information and wasn't a complaint or concern per se. Regards, --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * When did I mention that this info on Venezuela's history of aggression towards Guyana being unrelated to its possible arming of rebels? Also, if multiple users are questioning or asking for clarification on your use of WP:COATRACK in edit summaries, then respectively, that is on you. If you could be more clear and properly justify your claims of coatrack material, then there wouldn't be an issue. WMrapids (talk) 19:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * CVDX's message was just: In the interest of clarity, can you explain specifically what information/sections you consider to be examples of WP:COATRACK?. It really doesn't seem like questioning, as much as a simple request for more information.
 * As I have mentioned multiple times, the inclusion is improper since most of the claims of Venezuelan involvement mostly come from the Guyanese government (an authoritarian one, mind you), as well as the WP:SYNTH issues, where sources discussing the Rupununi uprising don't mention the facts that you included about Venezuela, and viceversa. --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * "most of the claims of Venezuelan involvement mostly come from the Guyanese government" You are misrepresenting what the sources say. The sources provided reported Venezuelan involvement in their own voice. Also, the sources directly mention the Rupununi uprising. I don't know what you are reading or maybe missing. WMrapids (talk) 20:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Most sources cite the Guyanese government when referring to this. --NoonIcarus (talk) 20:23, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Venezuelan historical administrative claims
Hi NoonIcarus, on the Guayana Esequiba talkpage you stated that the disputed area was historically included in the Delta Amacuro and Bolívar states. I was wondering if you had any relevant sources on the matter? The article says the same, but the sources cited do not appear to support this. On Venezuelan maps I've seen the area has always been separated into its own zona en reclamacion region, rather than as part of existing states. At the very least, the flag on the right indicates heavily that the claim is not linked to Delta Amacuro. CMD (talk) 17:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, kind regards. The sources that I provided are the same as in Spanish, which are the state constitutions from both Bolívar and Delta Amacuro, although admittedly these are primary sources and I'm sure that better references can be found. Please let me know if I can help in this regard. Best wishes, --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Eyepatch wearers has been nominated for deletion
Category:Eyepatch wearers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Fictional eyepatch wearers has been nominated for deletion
Category:Fictional eyepatch wearers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thank you kindly for the notice. --NoonIcarus (talk) 02:46, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure thing! I think that some of the folks might be mergable into blind people etc. Mason (talk) 02:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Death in Caracas


A tag has been placed on Category:Death in Caracas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 05:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Punnany Massif (December 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Punnany Massif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Punnany_Massif Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Punnany_Massif reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Coup template, yet again
Please check the recent additions to Coup d'état by Gorgonopsi and please guide the relatively new user. Some may be mere conspiracies that may need to be moved to the recently created conspiracies navbox. -- Minoa (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi! Sorry for the delay, but I have addressed this at least. Happy holidays, --NoonIcarus (talk) 20:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolina Chang (December 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carolina Chang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Carolina_Chang Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Carolina_Chang reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

International sanctions against Syria
Hello if you move article then also update lead and Wikidata otherwise it's a mess. Eurohunter (talk) 16:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * While I gather that the changes in Wikidata are automatic, I did forget to update the lead in this case. I'm truly sorry, thank you kindly for helping with the change in the article. Best wishes, --NoonIcarus (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * There are no automatic updates on Wikidata. It would remain there unchanged for months. Eurohunter (talk) 20:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello
May I please ask why the category of far right politics was removed from Jiminez? He is referred to as right wing in a foreign policy article here: https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/01/23/remembering-the-fall-of-a-venezuelan-strongman/ Firekong1 (talk) 22:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thank you for your message and sorry for the delay. My reason was mostly WP:CATV: the article simply does not mention any reference to far-right politics. The FP article similarly does not mention this, simply describing Pérez Jiménez as a traditional, U.S.-backed right-wing caudillo in the style of Cuba’s Batista. This is covered in categories such as Category:Venezuelan anti-communists. At any rate, his party New Order is already included in the "Far-right political parties in Venezuela" category. If there are sources delving into more detail, I would be happy to complete this information. Happy holidays! --NoonIcarus (talk) 11:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your response, no need to apologize. I apologize if it seemed like I was attempting to shove a partisan view into the article. I was mistaken adding it as I was subconsciously thinking of other right wing leaders backed by America who have been labeled as far right, such as Pinochet. I’m glad you cleared up that misunderstanding, and I will gladly find legitimate sources that describe Jiminez as far right in good conscience. Oh, and happy holidays to you to as well! Firekong1 (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Not at all! No worries, I did not see it that way. Latin America's dictatorships could have different policies and sometimes even be at odds with each others, but all of them were autocracies, so it's totally understandable. Pérez Jiménez policies (especifically economic ones) arguably can be in the middle of the political left/right spectrum, but he would easily fit in the fascism category. I would be eager to help because if there are further sources (and I'm sure that there are) there would be plenty of content that could be used to expand on political views. Happy New Year and happy editing! --NoonIcarus (talk) 23:21, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! I just wanted to clarify my intention with you because I have made the same mistake in the past, and some Wikipedia editors were not as kind and lenient as you, because they assumed my editing was for a disruptive intent to cause issues rather than a genuine conviction based on legitimate observable evidence. And thank you for your help, I will find more references to support my statements. It’s not just Jiminez that fits in the fascist and far-right category though. Thanks for your statement and your assistance And happy new year to you as well! :) Firekong1 (talk) 23:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * No worries! People sometimes can get jumpy in these moments, particularly when it's about politics, but one of Wikipedia's policies warns about not biting newcomers. If you explain your reasons for the edits or any confusion that you could have, everything should be alright :) Keep calm and carry on: there are many editors that will be happy to help or to guide, and editing can become really fulfilling.
 * That said, you can let me know if you have other any other questions regarding "rules", editing, or so on. Volunteers are always needed and welcome. Best wishes, --NoonIcarus (talk) 23:59, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

 * Thank you so much! Kind regards from the bottom of my heart, I hope this season is the best for you :) --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Simón (2023 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Simón (2023 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 14:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

WP:3O on Rupununi uprising
Notifying you that a third opinion has been requested for our dispute at Rupununi uprising. WMrapids (talk) 14:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Season's greetings
 ~ ~ ~ Merry Christmas! ~ ~ ~

'' Hello NoonIcarus: Enjoy the  holiday season &#32;and  winter solstice  if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) ''


 * Thank you very much! I wish you my best, enjoy these holidays as much as possible. --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Punnany Massif (December 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Punnany Massif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Punnany_Massif Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mach61&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Punnany_Massif reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 06:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Liz María Márquez
In the recently created article Liz María Márquez I'm puzzled as to why it states "Ulacio was elected as alternate deputy for the…" Is "Ulacio" a typo maybe, or am I just missing something? Happy New Year, BTW. — Hebrides (talk) 19:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm so sorry! You're totally right: Ulacio is the surname of Belkis Ulacio, who was also elected as an alternate deputy in the same elections. This is a mistake from the Spanish Wikipedia that I overlooked, thank you very much for pointing it out. Happy New Year! --NoonIcarus (talk) 19:38, 31 December 2023 (UTC)