User talk:Noormohammed satya/Archive 14

Orphaned non-free image File:Patiala Babes.png
Thanks for uploading File:Patiala Babes.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Sargun Kaur Luthra.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sargun Kaur Luthra.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Hugsyrup 11:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Requested for creation of few pages
Hi bro. Please create few pages for indian television channels, which are not present here, like Zee Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand, Zee Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh, Zee Bollywood, Zee Classic (TV Channel), Zee Bangla Cinema, Zee Keralam, &xplor HD, Star Maa Gold, MNX etc.

I would require some basic information and sources. Well, I would create some of them in few days after getting some information ~ User:Noormohammed satya

Information for MNX

MNX (launched as Movies Now 2) is an premium English language movie channel from The Times Group in India. Launching on 24 June 2016, it focuses action, thriller and horror Hollywood movies mainly.

After one year off it's launch, Movies Now 2 has been rebranded and rechristened it's identity to MNX on 15 July 2017.

References…..

Movies Now 2 to MNX (July 15, 2017)

https://bestmediainfo.com/2017/07/times-network-rebrands-movies-now-2-as-mnx/

https://www.exchange4media.com/industry-briefing-news/movies-now-2-gets-its-own-identity-in-mnx-69760.html

https://www.medianews4u.com/movies-now-2-mn2-adds-the-x-factor-will-now-be-called-as-mnx/

https://www.bizasialive.com/times-network-rechristens-movies-now-mnx/

Movies Now 2 launch date

https://www.exchange4media.com/media-tv-news/movies-now-gets-a-racy-extension-with-new-channel-movies-now-2-64987.html

https://www.adgully.com/times-network-s-movies-now-2-channel-goes-on-air-today-67434.html

https://www.medianews4u.com/times-network-launches-movies-now-2-hollywood-channel-catering-young-india/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.11.250.146 (talk) 07:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zee Classic (TV Channel)


A tag has been placed on Zee Classic (TV Channel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. bonadea contributions talk 16:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zee Bollywood


A tag has been placed on Zee Bollywood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. bonadea contributions talk 16:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Please be more discriminating when you create articles on behalf of IPs
Hi Noormohammed satya, you have recently created a number of Wikipedia articles on behalf of IP editors who have posted content to this talk page, for you to copy into an article. Please be more discriminating and careful about doing such things. At least three of your recent creations are articles that have been repeatedly created by undeclared paid editors, whose accounts have been blocked as sockpuppets – in fact, the article Zee Classic was protected against recreation a couple of months ago (which is why the IP asked you to use the title Zee Classic (TV Channel)). When other users or IPs ask you to create articles, it is important that you make sure that the subject is actually notable; if you see that an article has been deleted multiple times quite recently, and that IPs ask you personally to create a number of articles instead of going through normal channels, that is a sign that something may be a bit fishy. Please don't allow corporations to use Wikipedia as a promotional medium, by helping them circumvent our policies. I am not saying that you do that intentionally, just that it is something you need to keep in mind. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 16:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

The above also applies to uploading files on behalf of other users, as you were asked to do here ; it becomes very obvious here that these IPs are sockpuppets of the paid users mentioned above, who are aware of the fact that what they try to do is against Wikipedia policies. And they are trying to escape detection... please don't make any other edits on their behalf. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 16:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Hey bonadea, Thanks for making me aware about undeclared paid editors, I assure that I would be aware and would not edit anything on their behalf. Thanks! Noormohammed Satya

Orphaned non-free image File:Zee Punjab Haryana Himachal.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Zee Punjab Haryana Himachal.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  21:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  21:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Your proxying articles for UPE sockpuppets was a mistake. That makes you a meat puppet.