User talk:Noorster

Warnings
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]]

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abraham Darby II, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abraham Darby II was changed by Noorster (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-11T15:59:41+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Religious Society of Friends. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Utility Monster (talk) 18:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Religious Society of Friends. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Your edits are also blatant Vandalism - please stop. The edit(s) in question are as follows:, --4wajzkd02 (talk) 18:58, 20 October 2009 (UTC)