User talk:Nopsicle

Seph Lawless:
I appreciate your efforts to prevent Wikipedia from being abused for PR purposes. This... is a minefield, though. First, please carefully review Biographies of living persons (BLP).

After that, take a look at Wikipedia's stance on No original research, specifically WP:PRIMARY. To put it simply, we need reliable, independent sources (in this situation that means independent of both Lawless and his legal issues) to summarize these things for us. You may also find Identifying and using primary sources helpful. If no such reliable sources exist, this should not be added to the article. That may be frustrating, but there are reasons for these policies. I would be willing to answer questions you may have on this, or you may consider Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard useful for outside comments. Regarding this being SEO or similar, Wikipedia generally takes a dim view of conflict-of-interest editing (WP:COI), but be aware that BLP take priority over this. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 03:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Seph Lawless, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. '' Sorry but you need to stick to reliable source. Posting personal information is essentially doxxing, and cannot be allowed on Wikipedia.'' Grayfell (talk) 03:44, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:10, 10 May 2019 (UTC)