User talk:Norafem

The pages on abuse are some of the poorest I have come across on Wikipedia. Work on them would be most Valuable. Happy editing!--Charles (talk) 09:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Michaelbusch 06:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense of Fair fighting
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Fair fighting, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Fair fighting provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Fair fighting, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. MrOllie (talk) 17:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Hello. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but your recent contribution, to the page Passive–aggressive behavior seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. In additon it appears you may have a conflict of interest concerning this link. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see:
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest

Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Thanks! Ward20 (talk) 19:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 10:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Norafem,


 * I am responding to the note you left on my talk page. I can only speak for myself. Wikipedia is managed my consensus so you will have to determine for yourself if I am giving you helpful advice. In my view there are two problems concerning your website. The first is that it promotes and sells products. This is a touchy subject and though there may be useful information on your site, the commercial side of your site may disqualify linking to it under the guideline of link spamming. The second problem is that editors are discourged to link to a website they are affiliated with under the conflict of interest guideline. If you believe material from your website is of value in the Passive Aggressive article please discuss it on the talk page of the article. If the material is then added by an editor not associated with you (see also WP:MEAT), then everyone should be happy. Many people attempt to to use Wikipedia to promote their ideas or products and there is very little tolerance for it.


 * Perhaps someone did not like that you added links to your website and is now automatically reverting your editing. If you give a summary of your editing in the edit summary box and also discuss your edits briefly on the talk page of the article (say in the edit summary "see talk" if you discuss your edit on the talk page), it usually will have the effect of other editors giving your edits more consideration. They still may not agree with your edits and revert, but hopefully not revert your edits on sight. I hope that helps. Ward20 (talk) 00:55, 24 May 2009 (UTC)