User talk:Noraggingfoundation

Your link additions to various articles
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- Gogo Dodo 07:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it.  -- Siobhan Hansa 15:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Accounts adding links to http://www.no2ragging.org and http://noraggingfoundation.blogspot.com: -- Siobhan Hansa 15:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Question
Why are you creating empty articles like Harsh Agarwal and Mohit Garg whose entire content is ? -SpuriousQ (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
This is your final warning. Stop vandalising or you will be blocked from further editing., such as here, here, here, here, and here-  Tiswas (t) 16:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on No Ragging Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - Tiswas (t) 10:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007
This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to No Ragging Foundation, you will be blocked from editing. Wildthing61476 16:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Your edits
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked indefinitely without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline.


 * I have opened a case: Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard. Could you please discuss your edits there?  Thanks!  --Dirk Beetstra T  C 18:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

No Ragging Foundation Article

 * Please note that this has been pasted from Talk: No Ragging Foundation.

Thanks for your concerns regarding No Ragging Foundation, however, Wikipedia is not a database to promote your beliefs, but rather to provide a free, unbiased, neutral encyclopedia. Unfortunately, this does not meet these standards, because Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your organization. While this sounds like a great cause that is worth supporting, the article has to be written in such a way that it can meet Wikipedia's policies for articles. Please consider first creating your article at User:Noraggingfoundation/No Ragging Foundation, and then have several Wikipedians look at your article before creating it, so that everyone can be on the same page and you can get the article off to a good start. (Having the article checked by another Wikipeidan can be done by placing  on your talk page, and a leaving a brief message for a sysop to check your article for style and neutrality.) Thank you and good luck editing! Curran (talk 00:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:NRF Logo1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:NRF Logo1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)