User talk:NorcoKonaRockyOpusBrodie

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! France 3470   ( talk ) 16:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Bedford Biofuels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Miniapolis  ( talk ) 18:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Speedy deletion nomination of Bella bay estates


A tag has been placed on Bella bay estates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shirt58 (talk) 12:31, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WildPlay Element Parks
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LM103 (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ WildPlay Element Parks concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ WildPlay Element Parks, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC WildPlay Element Parks was accepted
 WildPlay Element Parks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! the panda ₯’ 20:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:NorcoKonaRockyOpusBrodie help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Spam on Mobile advertising
Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm Hwy43. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Port Hardy because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. See Talk:Port Hardy for more information. Hwy43 (talk) 07:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Spam?
Hello NorcoKonaRockyOpusBrodie. The "references" you inserted in Turks and Caicos Islands and Piracy are most certainly not reliable sources. While they do have some connection to the relevant topics, they actually look a lot like linkspam. In briefly looking through your contributions, I see that you've been inserting similar links for quite some while. Am I missing something? Do you think these citations meet the guideline? Since adding spam is forbidden and can lead to a loss of editing privileges, I thought I'd better check first to see if I'm somehow reading this wrong. Rivertorch&#39;s Evil Twin (talk) 03:44, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Rivertorch&#39;s Evil Twin, I tried to go to your talk page, but it's really confusing... You said this is a sockpuppet account, but when I go to your "real" account it says you have departed Wikipedia and you're not checking your Talk page? Wikipedia is very confusing, and it's obviously meant for people who can figure out the rules! I see that you have removed the citations. I'm not going to argue with you. If you feel that was necessary, that's great. I'm not even sure if you will see this reply! NorcoKonaRockyOpusBrodie (talk) 04:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the confusion. I do watch the talk pages where I've made a comment. (That's what most Wikipedians do, since it's the default setting, so you're usually safe replying on the same page as the comment you're replying to, as you did here.) Yes, Wikipedia can be confusing, but if you read the policy pages and pay attention to what they say, it eventually makes sense, for the most part. And there are a lot of people who are more than willing to help. You can ask questions at the Help Desk or by typing  in a new section here on your talk page.
 * It concerns me that you were warned twice—the first time in 2014 and then again nine months ago—about adding what appear to be spam or promotional links to articles but are still doing it. It's true that I have removed the two latest examples, but are there others outstanding? (I'll check back here for your reply, but not immediately.) Rivertorch&#39;s Evil Twin (talk) 04:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I had no idea there were others outstanding. WildPlay is a noteworthy place; the Port Hardy Hotel one was also a noteworthy place, but someone deleted it. I find Wikipedia is pretty hit-and-miss and inconsistent in terms of what is "allowed" and what is not allowed. It's also personality-driven, too, depending whoever is editing at the time. The culture of Wikipedia is very unique and unpredictable. So I generally just don't respond in order to avoid creating a conflict.


 * You see, this is the sort of thing I'm talking about. I get called out for spam --> you're using a sockpuppet that directs me to your original Talk Page --> your Talk Page says you're not checking your Talk Page --> we converse here, you call me a spammer --> you then go dark. Is it any wonder Wikipedia is perceived as a Byzantine, closed community that has no logicality when it comes to community rules? Highly frustrating.


 * Well, no. I didn't call you a spammer. In fact, I assumed good faith. (Doing so is one of those Byzantine aspects of Wikipedia, I guess.) And I didn't say there were other questionable links outstanding; I asked you if there were. Sigh. You see, those of us who have a working knowledge of Wikipedia get frustrated, too, because we've taken a lot of time and trouble to brush up on how things work and then, when we try to be helpful and kind, we're misunderstood. I could have just left you an impersonal boilerplate message like the ones further up this page. Get enough of those and you end up getting blocked. Instead, I chose to try to engage with you as a human being, in hopes of fixing what looked like a problem and not alienating a potentially good editor. If I wasted my time or yours, I sincerely apologize. Rivertorch   FIRE WATER   10:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * So you didn't call me a spammer, but you called my additions "spammy." And reverted them. Got it.

Conflict of interest policy
Hi NorcoKonaRockyOpusBrodie. If you could point me to the past discussion you had on the topic, that would help. --Ronz (talk) 17:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Partners REIT logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Partners REIT logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Udutu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Udutu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Udutu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ~ Bluecrystal004 ( talk · contribs ) 03:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)