User talk:Norden1990/Archive 9

Hippolytus, Bishop of Vác moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hippolytus, Bishop of Vác, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  PA TH  SL OP U  12:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hippolytus, Bishop of Vác has been accepted
 Hippolytus, Bishop of Vác, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Atlantic306 (talk) 14:55, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Hippolytus,_Bishop_of_V%C3%A1c help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating Ladislaus Jánki.

User:Onel5969 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Onel 5969  TT me 12:25, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PeyerKaroly.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PeyerKaroly.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Géza II of Hungary into Lucas, Archbishop of Esztergom. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:03, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CsakyKaroly.gif
Thanks for uploading File:CsakyKaroly.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PesthyPal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PesthyPal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Borkai
Szia! Látom, nem foglalkoztál azzal, amit a szerköfbe írtam. Ha már benne van a cikkben ez a sztori, legalább olyan forrást adjál meg hozzá, ami összhangban van vele. Ez az Index-cikk a legelső, ami az ügy kapcsán megjelent, ebben még semmi szó nem esett szexről, a videó később jelent meg a blogon. Több felelősséggel kellene a cikkeket szerkeszteni. Többet nem vonom vissza, feltéve, hogy megfelelő forrást mellékelsz. --Regasterios (talk) 17:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Látom, közben megtetted. Köszönöm. --Regasterios (talk) 17:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Norden1990

Thank you for creating Paul II, Archbishop of Kalocsa.

User:Cwmhiraeth, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:30, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HegedusLorant.gif
Thanks for uploading File:HegedusLorant.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PopovicsSandor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PopovicsSandor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GorondyNovakElemer.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GorondyNovakElemer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Too many requests at WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests
Thank you for your copy-editing requests at WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. In order to treat requests equitably, we have imposed a limit on requests, as shown at the top of the page: You may have up to two open requests at any one time. As such, I have removed your entire list of requests. You are welcome to use the submission button at the top of the page to submit one request at a time, with a limit of two open requests. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I am sorry. Thank you! --Norden1990 (talk) 16:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

GOCE copyedit request for Lucas, Archbishop of Esztergom
Expect a ping on the article's talk page as I will most likely have questions. My process can be found here. -- Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝)  00:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Changed template to show that the copyedit request has been completed. -- Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝)  06:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your work! --Norden1990 (talk) 09:24, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Central Cafe
Hi Norden1990, I wanted to thank you for corrections to Central Cafe. I would appreciate if you would be willing to add more. I was hoping on having it become a Good Article. Pratat (talk) 14:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Khust Raion
Hi,

the article's history section was just created. It seems a copy-paste from another language artificially translated, I corrected a few errors, but cannot decipher what is Vyshkovsky castle and the  Mick and Istvan Chepa of the Gunt-Pazman family, but I sure you'll manage. Please clarify and/or link properly. Thx(KIENGIR (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2020 (UTC))
 * , fixed (per Engel's archontology). --Norden1990 (talk) 09:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ferenc Barlabássy
Hello, Norden1990,

Thank you for creating Ferenc Barlabássy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"needs at least one more reference that can support meeting the WP:GNG"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) (click me!)    12:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Karl-Konstantin von Habsburg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karl-Konstantin von Habsburg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Karl-Konstantin von Habsburg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 19:04, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 20:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Re: 	Damir Karbić works
Thank you for the information, the works he uploaded there will certainly be helpful, even for other articles. Tezwoo (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

George Floyd
Hey, Norden1990. I'm concerned about your edit characterizing this subject primarily as a 'rapper and convicted criminal', which while true are very clearly not at all what this person is notable for. What was your thinking? —valereee (talk) 20:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * This person is not notable at all. His death and its consequences are notable only. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:59, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Hungarian historical atlas
Do you happen to know of a modern historical atlas of Hungary (published in recent years)? I'm making some maps based on a Croatian one from 2018 ("Hrvatski povijesni atlas") and Slovenian from 2011 ("Zgodovinski atlas Slovenije"), and would like to see a perspective from the Hungarian historiography. Tezwoo (talk) 20:49, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I don't know. :( --Norden1990 (talk) 18:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Moldova/Moldavia
Apart from being the name of a country, Moldova or Moldavia (there is no difference between the two words in either Romanian or Moldavian) is also the name of a region, divided between the two countries (Romania and Moldova). — GX, May 1971 (talk) 14:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, I known, but top of the article Moldova contains a clarification. I think it's more than enough. --Norden1990 (talk) 15:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Miep jobbik logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Miep jobbik logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:37, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary 3
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:StadingerIstvan.png
Thanks for uploading File:StadingerIstvan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bő (genus), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balaton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Üzenet
Egy, a tiedéhez hasonló username-mel rendelkező editor Talk page-én megjelent egy pozitív üzenet. Azt hittem rólad van szó, és a következőt írtam ugyanarra a Talk page-re: ":May I join? Örülök, hogy már hosszú ideje néha-néha összehoz a sors minket. Azt sejtem, ugyanolyan neveltetést kaptál mint én, úgyhogy nem dícsérlek, mert a dícséret mindig gyanús. :)" Now, I repeat the message on the proper Talk page. Borsoka (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , köszi szépen. A keresztes hadjáratokban sajna annyira nem vagyok otthon, szerkesztéseim nagyrészt a magyar törire (leginkább középkor) korlátozódnak. Ott úgy is hatalmas mennyiséget kell pótolni. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Timeline of historical geopolitical changes
See the subject. Is it ok, that Bécs became capital just like so? According to this, Matthias just removed his seat, but he left the former status of Buda. In case correct the article accordingly.(KIENGIR (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC))
 * I think it's OK. Vienna became de facto capital, as Matthias and the entire royal court moved there. During that time, there were no modern government organizations independently of the monarch's person. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

BUÉK
Köszönöm a jókívánságokat és én is boldog új évet kívánok neked és a családodnak! Csak jobb lesz... Borsoka (talk) 05:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ToryGusztav.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ToryGusztav.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Mi a baja a wikipédiának a Second Battle of Komárom című szócikkemmel?
Szia! Boldog új évet! Remélem jól vagy. Hosszú idő eltelt azóta, hogy nem szerkesztettem a wikipédiát. Aztán egy ideje elhatároztam, hogy folytatom az 1848-49-es csatákról szóló cikkeket. Alighogy elkezdtem a 2. komáromi csata folytatását (Second Battle of Komárom (1849)), elkezdtek zuhogni a figyelmezetések a wikipédia részéről. Először az volt a baj, hogy túl hosszú a cikk eleji ismertetés. Mondtam magamban, hogy rendben, lerövidítem, amikor kész leszek a cikkel. Aztán jött, hogy, úgymond a cikk lemásolta a magyar nyelvű wikipédia változatát. Na ez aztán a szemtelenség! Elég csak összehasonlítani a kettőt. Az én cikkem már a 250 sort is elhagyta, míg a magyar nyelvű cikknek a 2. komáromi csatáról szóló része 18 sorból áll, és a hivatkozásokban sem volt semmilyen átfedés (úgy tűnik, ezt a figyelmeztetést időközben kiszedték). Aztán, hogy sok benne a nyelvtani hiba. Na ezt elismerem, mert nem vagyok az angol nyelv nagy szakértője. Azonban van egy angol ismerősöm, aki ebben a témában szakavatott, és megígérte, hogy amint a cikk készen lesz, átnézi. Aztán jött a két utolsó támadás, amelyet én nem tudok értelmezni: 1. "This section needs more links to other articles to help integrate it into the encyclopedia." 2. "This section includes a list of general references, but it remains largely unverified because it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations." Mit akarnak ezek? Nem jók nekik az 1848-49-es szabadságharc legnagyobb szakértőinek Csikány Tamásnak és Hermann Róbertnek a művei erről a csatáról? számukra "unverified" egy olyan könyv, amelyet a magyar hadtörténésztanoncok tankönyvként használnak? Fő az, hogy a magyarellenes népirtást végrehajtó Avram Iancuról szóló, ezeket az atrocitásokat meg sem említő cikkekkel semmi problémájuk nincs... Mindez elveszi a kedvemet a további szerkesztéstől. Nem tudom, hogy kik vadásznak a cikkeimre, de gondolom, valamelyik környező nép tagjai. Minden jót.

Sylvain1975 (talk) 05:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Köszi szépen.

Sylvain1975 (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hát ha tudnál segíteni a táblázat dolgában. Sajnos nincs nagyon időm tanulmányozni, hogy hogyan kell táblázatokat készíteni a wikipédián. Sokszor a lábjegyzetek szerkesztésében is gondjaim vannak, mert amikor beírom, vörösbetűs figyelmeztetést kapok a lábjegyzet helyében. A lábjegyzeteket miért keveslik? szinte minden mondat után lábjegyzetet írtam. Hogy nem adtam száz cikket és könyvet, csak a Csikányét és Hermannét? Mert nincs is más, ezzel a csatával foglalkozó cikk a szakirodalomban. A más szócikkekre való hivatkozások alatt mit értenek pontosan?

Sylvain1975 (talk) 07:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Szia, látom, hogz megint szaporodott az "issues"-ok száma a 2. komáromi csatáról szóló cikkemmel kapcsolatban... Most azzal bővült, hogy nem egy enciklopédia cikk, hanem egy mese... Az általam használt irodalom nem meséskönyvek, hanem a legkomolyabb hadtörténelmi munkák... Vagy az a baj, hogy túl hosszú? Ha a gettysburgi csatáról szóló cikk lehet kétszer annyira hosszú, akkor egy magyar csatáról szóló cikk miért nem lehet? sőt a gettysburgi csata mindkét napjáról külön-külön cikket írtak, majd utána egy olyant is, amely közösen tárgyalja a csata két napját (tehát összesen 3 cikk egy csatáról). Ezen megjegyzések egyre jobban úgy kezdenek nekem tűnni, hogy nem kritikák, hanem rosszindulatú támadások. Nagyon sok időmbe kerül, mert nincs időm, ezért úgye, majd hozzájárulsz ahhoz, hogy eltávolítsák ezt a csomó "issue" figyelmeztetést róla? Mert ha ezek maradnak, akkor inkább nem fejezem be. Nem akarom, hogy miután egy csomót kínlódtam rajta, ott díszelegjenek fölötte az olvasókat elriasztó "figyelmeztetések".

Sylvain1975 (talk) 11:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Talk page for coups and self-coups template
Hi, I saw you make an edit regarding an issue under discussion on Template:Coup d'état, but you have not posted anything on the talk page. I invite you to go to Template_talk:Coup_d%27état to discuss the matter.—Beneficii (talk) 20:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demetrius I Csák, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

List of heads of state of Hungary
Hi,

after I fixed the mistake with Peidl, I was unable to make the color in the box indetical with party color above...can you fix it replace the black one to the kind of reddish one above? Thank You(KIENGIR (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC))
 * , I fixed the color problem. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Gömör county
Thanks for the move. A few more articles stucked in the same failed manner in the same area, they are on my watchlist but did not have time to fix them yet. Maybe you could do the moves there as well, and after inform me, and then I will perform an overall cleanup.(KIENGIR (talk) 09:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC))
 * , what articles, for instance? --Norden1990 (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe there are not more, or I did not find now what I remembered. However, when the article's split has been completed, Gömör County has to be removed from the Category:Traditional regions of Slovakia, along with Torna County, and possibly as well a region article should be created about the latter (and those may be readded).(KIENGIR (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC))

Edit warring
Please stop edit warring on Template:Coup d'état, you are nearing WP:3RR. The article 2021 storming of the United States Capitol provides multiple reliable sources that describe the even as an attempted coup. Do not inject your own opinion on the event. Thank you. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 21:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , You are the one trying to accept a political opinion as a fact. Even the article do not say factually that it was a coup, which term appears only in the terminology section next to other terms. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Norden, a complete nonsense is going on around these issue. See this revision and check the amazing RFC closure text. (I voted, however the article is not on my watchlist). Around 40 votes for terrorism, around 30 against, around 20 said wait...a the closure contains that consensus appears in favor of characterizing this event as terrorism....awesome isn't it? Even if just not the number of votes count, but the strenght of the arguments, practically 50 vs 40 against...political shoapboxing and lobbying became really a dangerous phenomenon here...(KIENGIR (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC))
 * Indeed. I think I would do better to return to the topic of Medieval Hungary. --Norden1990 (talk) 10:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest you to extend it to all Hungary related area, broadly construed (at least).(KIENGIR (talk) 10:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC))
 * Unfortunately, I have no time for this. Formerly, I also dealt with present Hungarian politics (MPs, parties, elections etc.), but my interest in this direction has waned in recent years. As far as medieval Hungary is concerned, there is quite a lot to do, and mostly no one else is editing on this topic, so it is maximally enough for me for the time being. --Norden1990 (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I see, unfortunately many articles should be improved in these areas, but our time is scarce and unfortunately some of the fellow editors are became much less active. At least medieval history you may extend to overall Hungarian history, not included especially politics if you've got fed up with it.(KIENGIR (talk) 09:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC))

Ilona Massey
Hi,

look on the latest edit. There are contradictive info regarding birth time and place, e.g. or. I have no power to investigate it now, could you solve/decide instead which is correct? (and in case update accordingly in HUWP?) Thanks.(KIENGIR (talk) 21:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC))
 * Leave it, meanwhile I found the perfect source.(KIENGIR (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC))
 * Ok. Unfortunately, MÉL sometimes is inaccurate. --Norden1990 (talk) 22:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

old comment, but, no
" In Hungarian historiography, based on political, legal and historical reasons, Middle Ages lasted in Hungary until 1526 " - I know what you were trying to say, but historical time-periods are not customized to fit the socio-economic conditions of any territory/people within those time-frames. You caused historians to shudder across Wiki, calling for your burning at the stake - thankfully, I stopped them from carrying it out. Carry on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.51.247 (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Philip Türje
He was indeed Hungarian, but he was also a Roman Catholic bishop in Croatia, wasnt he? Category:Archbishops of Esztergom brings him into Hungarian people. Rathfelder (talk) 22:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Category:Archbishops of Esztergom does not bring him into 13th-century Hungarian people. --Norden1990 (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Well by all means put him there, but leave him in Croatia. Rathfelder (talk) 22:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Bishops by nationality
Could you have a look at this discussion? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_28#Category:Roman_Catholic_bishops_by_nationality I think it is more or less agreed that bishops should be categorised by location, not nationality. Rathfelder (talk) 22:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

You think 12th-century Roman Catholic bishops in Hungary should also be in Category:12th-century Hungarian people? I was thinking we only needed to do that for people who were not bishops in their native country. Rathfelder (talk) 23:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I added non-diffusing subcategory template to all RC bishops categories, similarly to Category:12th-century Hungarian women etc. --Norden1990 (talk) 23:15, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Missing cites in 1990 Hungarian parliamentary election
The article cites 7 short cites but no sources are listed in the bibliography (this issue dates from 2015). Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 04:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Norden1990 (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)