User talk:Nordicpadawan

March 2014
Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Tomas van Houtryve, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:44, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tomas van Houtryve with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tomas van Houtryve, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Tomas van Houtryve was changed by Nordicpadawan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.915675 on 2014-03-11T20:57:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Tomas van Houtryve
Hi. Just so you know, it is not up to the above person whether he has a page on Wikipedia. If he has any claims of bias or inaccuracy, he can deal with that. You cannot do it for him. He needs to contact Wikipedia via email at info-en-q@wikimedia.org. He will be asked to verify his identity. He is also welcome to correct any uncited information in the article via the normal editing process, as are you. However, cited material should not be changed by either the subject of the article or anyone on his behalf. You are welcome to discuss those issues on his article talk page, however. John from Idegon (talk) 20:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Now that another editor has restored the article, it appears that it is doubtful he even qualifies for a Wikipedia article, so I will nominate it for deletion. It takes 10 days for that to happen, assuming my opinion is correct and others agree with me. John from Idegon (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)