User talk:Nornisse

Re: Comment from Nornisse
Nornise wrote:
 * I have to question your motives for reverting the Yule article back to Right Wing Neo-Nazi extremist pagan-propaganda. If you don't believe that Scandinavian Humanist celebrate a secular Yule and do believe that the burning cross/wheel has anything to do with a non-christian Yule you are very sadly confused. Please revert the article back to reality. If you do not believe this I suggest you talk to some of the hundreds of thousands Humanist Yule celebrants in Scandinavia or millions of secular Yule celebrants in Scandinavia - you will find that they outnumber the neo-pagans by far and are not happy about this article at all. 


 * Modern Neo-pagans are at best a marginal Winter Solstice celebrating group compared to others. In fact the Yule word is Scandinavian in orgin, this is why it is used in Scotland and is in the English language. Admit please that this article has been hijacked på extemists with a different agenda and rectefy your mistake by reverting it back to the edit. Leaving out the Humanist Winter Solstice celbrations "Yule" is a serious factual mistake. Thank you.


 * Sorry for jumping the gun on this one. Seems that the user Whenning is the culprit in this revert. I want to avoid a edit war though. – Nornisse 22:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh, and wanted to thank you for the gramatical/spelling clean up. Still think the article should be reverted back to your last edit, even what ever the christian spammer and neo-nazi deleter wants.


 * Thank you! :) – Nornisse 00:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Ah, sorry about that. I reverted the edit by 24.125.52.119, because it removed a large section of the article, and thus seemed to be vandalism. I should probably have gone back and checked the previous edits by 84.209.217.181 and earlier editors. (This is a common problem with fixing vandalism; you revert the last, obviously unacceptable change without being entirely sure what was there before). Whenning just did the same thing I did; 24.125.52.119 vandalised again, and he reverted back to my version. If there's a problem with the article now then by all means feel free to fix it – Gurch 05:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)