User talk:Noronor0

Welcome!
Hello, Noronor0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fenox venture capital, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Dewritech (talk)  11:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Fenox venture capital


A tag has been placed on Fenox venture capital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Dewritech (talk)  11:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I've seen your message, but I'm going out for most of today. I'll reply when I can  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:15, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, several problems.
 * Your only edits have been creating this article and a blatant hagiography of the company's founder which I have also now deleted. This suggests that you are editing on behalf of the company and have an obvious conflict of interest. You could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
 * It was written in a promotional tone, and had been tagged for speedy deletion before I saw it. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * It's all about what the company does, little about the company itself other than locations. How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
 * In contrast, you have a very spammy list of investments. There shouldn't be any url links in the text, but particularly not when they are used to link to your company or its affiliates.
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:  assists them to achieve global expansion... The market focuses for Fenox VC include the consumer Internet, retail and software sectors... span across all stages... 

For obvious reasons, articles about companies are going to attract scrutiny. Companies writing about themselves inevtably only want to talk about what they are selling. Although the language and tone of yours is more restrained than many, the fact remains that you have written about the investments rather than producing a balanced article about all aspects of the company. The article about the big boss was so obviously adulatory in tone that I won't address the issues there unless you particularly want me to.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:07, 24 April 2013 (UTC)