User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2013/October

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States federal government shutdown of 2013, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Solicitor general and Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Barry McCaffrey
You wrote "You don't control Wikipedia pages, and you don't order editors around."

I reply, you hae no right to post false and libelous information about a living person. Stop. Jay.wind (talk) 08:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * You have not made any claim as to what information is false and libelous. You have not discussed on the relevant talk page your specific objections. You removed a large amount of text which is reliably-sourced and is not obviously false, libelous or violative of any content policy. You need to bring up your objections about specific material on a talk page. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:11, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute closed
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
 * 1)  is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
 * 2)  is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
 * 3)  is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
 * 4)  is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
 * 5)  is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed. He is also topic banned from all pages (including biographies) related to leaks of classified information, broadly construed.
 * 6)  is admonished for acting in a manner incompatible with the community's expectations of administrators (see ).
 * 7)  is indefinitely prohibited from using his administrator permissions (i) on pages relating to transgender people or issues and (ii) in situations involving such pages. This restriction may be first appealed after six months have elapsed, and every six months thereafter.
 * 8) The standard discretionary sanctions adopted in Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology for (among other things) "all articles dealing with transgender issues" remain in force. For the avoidance of doubt, these discretionary sanctions apply to any dispute regarding the proper article title, pronoun usage, or other manner of referring to any individual known to be or self-identifying as transgender, including but not limited to Chelsea/Bradley Manning.  Any sanctions imposed should be logged at the Sexology case, not this one.
 * 9) All editors, especially those whose behavior was subject to a finding in this case, are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions on Wikipedia, and to avoid commentary that demeans any other person, intentionally or not.

For the Arbitration Committee, Rschen7754 01:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Edward Snowden is still an American fugitive even with temporary asylum
Your good faith edit appears to conflict with the cited reference about his father's visit which describes Edward Snowden as a fugitive  even with temporary asylum within Russia.Patroit22 (talk) 11:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Organizations accused of piracy
Category:Organizations accused of piracy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 18:24, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tropes vs. Women in Video Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zelda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Akahi Nui ‎ edit
Thank you for your neutral edit, returning the article to a more encyclopedic version. I am still very concerned about this article and claims, sources etc.. I will be doing some major re-writing soon on the article and wish you to add input and contributions as you feel fit. This subject may be very contentious and I am aware of the delicate nature of thses subjects in the real world. I wish only to summarize the facts from actual RS and not the current sourcing that seems to fall far hort of Wikipedia standards.--Mark Miller (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Organizations accused of eco-terrorism
Category:Organizations accused of eco-terrorism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Sea Shepherd Conservation Society
Your comments would be appreciated at Talk:Sea Shepherd Conservation Society regarding your current position on whether or not should be a subcat of  or whether only Sea Shepherd Conservation Society should be in. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 00:02, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Given the nomination below, could you please clarify your current position on whether or not should be a subcat of  or whether only Sea Shepherd Conservation Society should be in . -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 01:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

North, on that note thank you for your civil tone. We may not agree but as a citizen of Earth and a human with feelings, I sure do appreciate a good civil disagreement. ;) Cheers.