User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2013/September

Cash Dome
well I do think its constructive on the show they talk about the just out of prison I think people should know that he really was in prison and what he was in prison for — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keysdiver76 (talk • contribs) 14:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The use of primary sources such as court documents violates basic Wikipedia policy. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Bradley Manning
Hey NorthBySouthBaranof,

I made a bold change in the article, which I explained on the talk page. I see you rolled me back, while I disagree with that, per my statement on the talk page, I won't edit-war your roll back. KoshVorlon. We are all Kosh ... 19:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

North by SouthBaranof You have made two reversions to the Bradley Manning section of Crescent, Oklahoma. Why is irrelevant to list the name on the conviction, the name used by the military prison to identify this individual and the listing name for the Wikipedia entry.Patroit22 (talk) 20:42, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback Tool update
Hey NorthBySouthBaranof. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 22:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Temporary Injunction Enacted
The Arbitration Committee has passed a temporary injunction in the case in which you are a party to. The full text of the injunction follows: The articles "Bradley Manning", "United States v. Manning", and "Chelsea Manning gender identity media coverage" are placed under standard discretionary sanctions for the duration of the case. Unless otherwise provided for in the final decision, any sanction imposed pursuant to this injunction will automatically lapse upon the closure of the case.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale &#124; dance in the air and follow his steps 23:10, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Evidence phase open - Manning naming dispute
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Evidence. Please add your evidence by September 23, 2013, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Seddon talk 10:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Manning
Thanks for collecting all these quotes. I also noticed this one:  Josh Gorand (talk) 09:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I also believe there were some comparisons to Minnie Mouse, bananas etc. as Sue mentions (I'm certain I saw those comments, but I couldn't find them now). Josh Gorand (talk) 09:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I'm not necessarily done, just had to stop for the night. There's only so much Augean stables one can clean at a time. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 16:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

United States Armed Forces
There is a discussion underway on Talk:United States Armed Forces regarding the Male – Female table listing sequence. If you wish to make your case for Female – Male, you should do so. – S. Rich (talk) 00:43, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Please reconsider
I won't put this appeal to you into the unblock template, as I'm not the right person to review your block (having blocked you previously), but I'm really sorry to see you blocked for edit warring again. Do please reconsider your approach. The more blocks for edit warring admins see in your log, the more likely they'll be to block you again. I hope you'll reconsider and find another way, because it seems to me you have a lot to contribute to the encyclopedia. Bishonen &#124; talk 19:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC).

Blocked for edit warring
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Femininity. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Woody (talk) 19:30, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

I blocked you primarily because of the nature of the edit war. The article was fully protected for three days to stop the edit warring that had begun on the article. The discussion on the dispute had started on the talkpage and seemed to be going somewhere: consensus looked like it could have formed. The second that the page was unprotected though, you both started edit warring again. You did not need to start edit warring again, particularly given you have been blocked for it before. You know that you shouldn't have done it. All you needed to do was wait for a consensus and then if the other user continued to edit war, they would have been blocked.

I am leaving the unblock request so that another admin can come and have a look and make up their own mind about whether to unblock you and/or the other user. For the reviewing admin, take whatever action you feel necessary without the need to ask me. Regards, Woody (talk) 20:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Right, a consensus had formed - a consensus that the changes the IP was seeking to implement were not supported by the source, nor was his claim that "stereotype" violates NPOV well-founded. The IP user then disregarded the consensus and basically said "I'll just keep reverting." NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:15, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deer Mountain (Alaska), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alpine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=572973197 your edit] to Ward Cove may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * in 1997 and has largely been demolished. As of 2013, the site was

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573072885 your edit] to Shoshone National Forest may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Treaty Council of 1868]] Washakie negotiated with the U.S. Government for 44000000 acre to be preserved as tribal lands. Subsequent amendments to the treaty reduced the actual acreage to

Ketchikan/SE Alaska area articles
I am glad to work with you. These could use some more attention if you have access to some references: Wards Cove Packing Company, Ward Cove, Bay of Pillars, Hetta inlet, George Inlet. If you'd like to suggest others, that would be great. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

A friendly FYI: Template:Did you know nominations/Pennock Island, Tongass Narrows. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

John Lemon (prospector)
Hi! Nice to see another user from Southeast Alaska! I recently created an article for John Lemon (prospector), but it is only a stub at this point, as info on him is hard to find. Take a peak at the article, and any help will be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Juneau Mike (talk) 23:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your Arbitration evidence is too long
Hello, NorthBySouthBaranof. Thank you for your recent submission of evidence for the Manning naming dispute Arbitration case. As you may be aware, the Arbitration Committee asks that users submitting evidence in cases adhere to limits regarding the length of their submissions. These limits, currently at 1000 words and 100 diffs for parties and 500 words and 50 diffs for all others, are in place to ensure that the Arbitration Committee receives only the most important information relevant to the case, and is able to determine an appropriate course of action in a reasonable amount of time. The evidence you have submitted currently exceeds at least one of these limits, and is presently at 1364 words and 31 diffs. Please try to reduce the length of your submission to fit within these limits; this guide may be able to provide some help in doing so. If the length of your evidence is not reduced soon, it may be refactored or removed by a human clerk within a few days. Thank you! If you have any questions or concerns regarding the case, please contact the drafting Arbitrator or case clerk (who are listed on the case pages); if you have any questions or concerns about this bot, please contact the operator. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Hers fold ArbClerkBOT(talk) 04:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Pennock Island
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Tongass Narrows
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Minidoka National Historic Site, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lake Tahoe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)