User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2015/May

OnLive BLP article
Last week on the reliable source noticeboard I asked you what the next steps were regarding BLP. My read of BLP is that the article should be immediately removed, since the article is about a living person, identifies no sources, is not corroborated by any other article I can find or anyone has suggested, does not state any effort was made to contact the subject of the article to comment on the facts, and we can see that at least one highly credible publication has removed a link to it. You said there was no need for me to do anything and you would be looking at the reliability of the article from a BLP standpoint. Have you had a chance to do this? Or should I post it on the BLP noticeboard or doing something else? As I mentioned, I agree with MIT Technology Review that the article's lack of reliability is clear-cut in non-Wikipedia journalism, so I'm increasingly intrigued to see what the outcome is on Wikipedia and I'd love to write about it, particularly as we are taking a closer look at the credibility of journalism in the wake of the Rolling Stone scandal. Thank you for your time on it so far, and let me know if I should seek out another editor to help me through the process if you are too busy. Thanks! Starkcasted (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC)